H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Els Callens vs Nicole Bradtke H2H: 1-0

Els Callens holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Bradtke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Els Callens leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Els Callens won the 1996 US Open round of 128 7-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Els Callens
BEL Age 56 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nicole Bradtke
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Els Callens #118 7-6 7-6 Nicole Bradtke #71 Match data Aug 28, 1996* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Els Callens #473 #43 582 1,715 83 128 39.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nicole Bradtke #394 #24 256 1,866 182 164 52.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Els Callens Nicole Bradtke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1985 1–2 33.3% #147 1,507 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1986 6–5 54.5% #123 1,548 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1987 15–19 44.1% #78 1,599 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1988 24–17 58.5% #34 1,739 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1989 16–17 48.5% #61 1,710 0 0
20 1991 1–1 50.0% #168 1,509 0 0 1990 21–20 51.2% #49 1,757 0 0
21 1992 0–1 0.0% #231 1,492 0 0 1991 21–19 52.5% #45 1,759 0 0
22 1993 2–1 66.7% #188 1,513 0 0 1992 22–18 55.0% #47 1,710 0 1
23 1994 4–3 57.1% #110 1,560 0 0 1993 26–14 65.0% #26 1,756 0 2
24 1995 8–11 42.1% #95 1,551 0 0 1994 2–5 28.6% #153 1,704 0 2
25 1996 13–12 52.0% #51 1,692 0 0 1995 21–15 58.3% #37 1,785 0 3
26 1997 8–16 33.3% #98 1,579 0 0 1996 6–11 35.3% #94 1,708 0 3
27 1998 2–8 20.0% #102 1,525 0 0 1997 1–2 33.3% #394 1,696 0 3
28 1999 7–9 43.8% #82 1,569 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2000 8–13 38.1% #100 1,564 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2001 2–6 25.0% #177 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2002 9–10 47.4% #67 1,606 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2003 13–19 40.6% #73 1,637 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2004 5–15 25.0% #122 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2005 1–3 25.0% #224 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Els Callens Nicole Bradtke
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 5 5 10 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 10 9 19 52.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1991 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1990 10 11 21 47.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1992 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 14 10 24 58.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1992 13 8 21 61.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1994 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1995 13 9 22 59.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 1997 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 5 6 11 45.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 3 9 12 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 26 49 75 34.7% 15 29 44 34.1% 19 23 42 45.2% 23 27 50 46.0% — 106 83 189 56.1% 48 44 92 52.2% 18 23 41 43.9% 10 14 24 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Els Callens Nicole Bradtke
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1508 116.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +0.25
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1548 101.9 — — — — +44 -8 — 53.8% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +2.05
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1599 120.5 — — — — +20 -1 -62 44.3% -0.33 6–5 (55%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +1.69
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1739 135.8 — — — — -93 +65 -219 57.3% +0.23 7–7 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.0 -0.02
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1711 134.8 — — — — -34 +69 -153 48.7% -0.16 7–5 (58%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 +0.32
20 1991 1509 97.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.24 1990 1758 145.1 — — — — -31 +44 -163 52.6% +0.22 6–9 (40%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 -2.63
21 1992 1493 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 1991 1760 142.2 — — — — +22 -3 -161 50.5% +0.33 9–6 (60%) 5–8 (38%) 98.9 -2.07
22 1993 1514 102.8 — — — — +47 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 — — +0.46 1992 1710 137.2 — — — — +42 -8 -96 57.0% +0.69 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 92.0 +0.67
23 1994 1561 113.2 — — — — +25 — — 56.3% +0.63 1–1 1–0 — -0.16 1993 1756 140.3 — — — — +73 -52 -113 62.8% +1.01 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 101.7 +0.27
24 1995 1551 116.0 — — — — -68 +43 +105 45.2% -0.24 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.58 1994 1705 114.0 — — — — +54 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 1–0 — +0.09
25 1996 1692 128.2 — — — — -52 -110 +3 48.1% -0.30 4–2 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 +0.50 1995 1786 146.5 — — — — -12 -47 -117 57.1% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 101.7 -2.62
26 1997 1579 109.4 — — — — +17 -21 +72 33.3% -1.26 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.4 +0.32 1996 1709 125.5 — — — — +33 -3 — 43.2% -0.81 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 94.7 -0.45
27 1998 1525 102.8 — — — — +21 — — 34.8% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — +0.31 1997 1696 110.1 — — — — +26 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — -0.02
28 1999 1570 122.3 — — — — -17 +45 — 44.4% -0.08 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 1565 124.4 — — — — +8 +10 -5 44.9% -0.06 1–6 (14%) 2–4 (33%) 93.3 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 1523 118.1 — — — — +25 +26 — 33.3% -0.72 0–2 0–2 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1606 123.2 — — — — +7 -75 -6 42.6% -0.40 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 105.1 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 1637 127.2 -0.92 -1.45 0.759 44.5% +8 -178 +36 41.1% -0.48 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 1539 102.6 -1.13 -2.60 0.779 44.6% +15 -107 +61 33.3% -1.44 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.1 -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1522 96.0 -1.14 -3.36 0.793 46.2% +16 — — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1716 123.9 -1.05 -2.22 0.772 44.7% -2 -39 +39 41.1% -0.57 30–36 (45%) 22–25 (47%) 98.5 -0.12 — 1866 143.1 — — — — +7 +12 -133 52.8% +0.22 52–57 (48%) 38–42 (48%) 97.9 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.