H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Els Callens vs Paola Suarez H2H: 1-1
Els Callens and Paola Suarez are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Paola Suarez won the 2004 Wimbledon second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2004* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Paola Suarez | 6-2 6-2 | Els Callens | Match data |
| Jun 25, 1997* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Els Callens | 6-4 6-2 | Paola Suarez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Els Callens | #473 | #43 | 582 | 1,716 | 82 | 127 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paola Suarez | #525 | #9 | 2,081 | 1,916 | 223 | 180 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Els Callens | Paola Suarez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #114 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #118 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #188 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #80 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #110 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #95 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #36 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #51 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #102 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1999 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2000 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #100 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #238 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #178 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2002 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #67 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2003 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #73 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #224 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |