H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Els Callens vs Samantha Reeves H2H: 1-0

Els Callens holds a 1–0 lead over Samantha Reeves in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Els Callens leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Els Callens won the 2002 Waikoloa quarterfinal 4-6 7-5 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Els Callens
BEL Age 56 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Samantha Reeves
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Els Callens #73 4-6 7-5 6-0 Samantha Reeves #74 Match data Sep 15, 2002* QF Waikoloa Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Els Callens #473 #43 582 1,715 83 128 39.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Samantha Reeves #864 #62 523 1,629 30 59 33.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Els Callens Samantha Reeves
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1998 2–8 20.0% #111 1,480 0 0
20 1991 1–1 50.0% #168 1,509 0 0 1999 4–8 33.3% #121 1,480 0 0
21 1992 0–1 0.0% #231 1,492 0 0 2000 1–4 20.0% #171 1,446 0 0
22 1993 2–1 66.7% #188 1,513 0 0 2001 4–3 57.1% #106 1,515 0 0
23 1994 4–3 57.1% #110 1,560 0 0 2002 8–14 36.4% #108 1,544 0 0
24 1995 8–11 42.1% #95 1,551 0 0 2003 8–10 44.4% #74 1,588 0 0
25 1996 13–12 52.0% #51 1,692 0 0 2004 3–12 20.0% #198 1,526 0 0
26 1997 8–16 33.3% #98 1,579 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1998 2–8 20.0% #102 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1999 7–9 43.8% #82 1,569 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2000 8–13 38.1% #100 1,564 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2001 2–6 25.0% #177 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2002 9–10 47.4% #67 1,606 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2003 13–19 40.6% #73 1,637 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2004 5–15 25.0% #122 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2005 1–3 25.0% #224 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Els Callens Samantha Reeves
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1991 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1999 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1992 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2001 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
23 1994 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2002 5 7 12 41.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2003 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2004 1 5 6 16.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1997 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 5 6 11 45.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 3 9 12 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 26 49 75 34.7% 15 29 44 34.1% 19 23 42 45.2% 23 27 50 46.0% — 14 27 41 34.1% 11 22 33 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Els Callens Samantha Reeves
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1480 114.3 — — — — +27 +68 — 29.2% -1.17 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — -0.17
20 1991 1509 97.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.24 1999 1481 106.1 — — — — +28 +49 — 34.6% -1.65 1–1 1–0 — +0.52
21 1992 1493 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 2000 1447 92.1 — — — — — +34 — 18.2% -1.45 1–0 0–1 — +0.50
22 1993 1514 102.8 — — — — +47 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 — — +0.46 2001 1515 113.3 — — — — +30 — — 47.1% +0.12 3–0 (100%) 1–0 — +0.29
23 1994 1561 113.2 — — — — +25 — — 56.3% +0.63 1–1 1–0 — -0.16 2002 1545 121.7 — — — — +16 -68 — 42.6% -0.48 3–7 (30%) 4–5 (44%) 96.7 -0.91
24 1995 1551 116.0 — — — — -68 +43 +105 45.2% -0.24 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.58 2003 1589 112.2 -1.00 +0.72 0.861 46.5% -29 -69 +14 41.0% -0.92 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.54
25 1996 1692 128.2 — — — — -52 -110 +3 48.1% -0.30 4–2 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 +0.50 2004 1526 110.0 -3.84 -1.12 0.609 38.9% -9 -32 — 24.2% -1.70 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.74
26 1997 1579 109.4 — — — — +17 -21 +72 33.3% -1.26 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.4 +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 1525 102.8 — — — — +21 — — 34.8% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 1570 122.3 — — — — -17 +45 — 44.4% -0.08 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 1565 124.4 — — — — +8 +10 -5 44.9% -0.06 1–6 (14%) 2–4 (33%) 93.3 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 1523 118.1 — — — — +25 +26 — 33.3% -0.72 0–2 0–2 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1606 123.2 — — — — +7 -75 -6 42.6% -0.40 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 105.1 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 1637 127.2 -0.92 -1.45 0.759 44.5% +8 -178 +36 41.1% -0.48 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 1539 102.6 -1.13 -2.60 0.779 44.6% +15 -107 +61 33.3% -1.44 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.1 -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1522 96.0 -1.14 -3.36 0.793 46.2% +16 — — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1716 123.9 -1.05 -2.22 0.772 44.7% -2 -39 +39 41.1% -0.57 30–36 (45%) 22–25 (47%) 98.5 -0.12 — 1630 116.7 -2.07 +0.03 0.755 43.6% +12 -24 +14 35.8% -0.99 15–15 (50%) 8–9 (47%) 103.4 -1.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.