H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Els Callens vs Sandra Cacic H2H: 0-2
Sandra Cacic holds a 2–0 lead over Els Callens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sandra Cacic leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Cacic won the 1997 Birmingham third round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1997* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Sandra Cacic | 6-3 7-6 | Els Callens | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1996* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sandra Cacic | 6-3 6-4 | Els Callens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Els Callens | #473 | #43 | 582 | 1,716 | 82 | 127 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Els Callens | Sandra Cacic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #188 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #110 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #95 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #51 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #102 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #100 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #67 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2003 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #73 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #224 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |