H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Els Callens vs Sandra Cacic H2H: 0-2

Sandra Cacic holds a 2–0 lead over Els Callens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sandra Cacic leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Cacic won the 1997 Birmingham round of 32 6-3 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Els Callens
BEL Age 56 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Sandra Cacic
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Cacic #98 6-3 7-6 Els Callens #47 Match data Jun 12, 1997* R32 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Sandra Cacic #63 6-3 6-4 Els Callens #97 Match data Jan 17, 1996* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Els Callens #473 #43 582 1,715 83 128 39.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sandra Cacic #409 #39 548 1,730 58 96 37.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Els Callens Sandra Cacic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1991 0–1 0.0% #310 1,481 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1993 4–6 40.0% #76 1,533 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1994 12–16 42.9% #54 1,617 0 0
20 1991 1–1 50.0% #168 1,509 0 0 1995 7–12 36.8% #114 1,602 0 0
21 1992 0–1 0.0% #231 1,492 0 0 1996 9–12 42.9% #78 1,569 0 1
22 1993 2–1 66.7% #188 1,513 0 0 1997 7–11 38.9% #60 1,581 0 1
23 1994 4–3 57.1% #110 1,560 0 0 1998 7–16 30.4% #82 1,556 0 1
24 1995 8–11 42.1% #95 1,551 0 0 1999 2–7 22.2% #188 1,509 0 1
25 1996 13–12 52.0% #51 1,692 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #140 1,505 0 1
26 1997 8–16 33.3% #98 1,579 0 0 2001 9–11 45.0% #117 1,577 0 1
27 1998 2–8 20.0% #102 1,525 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #322 1,565 0 1
28 1999 7–9 43.8% #82 1,569 0 0 2003 1–2 33.3% #395 1,548 0 1
29 2000 8–13 38.1% #100 1,564 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2001 2–6 25.0% #177 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2002 9–10 47.4% #67 1,606 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2003 13–19 40.6% #73 1,637 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2004 5–15 25.0% #122 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2005 1–3 25.0% #224 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Els Callens Sandra Cacic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1991 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1995 4 6 10 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1992 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 9 6 15 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1994 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 5 9 14 35.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1999 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1997 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2001 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 5 6 11 45.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 3 9 12 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 26 49 75 34.7% 15 29 44 34.1% 19 23 42 45.2% 23 27 50 46.0% — 38 48 86 44.2% 10 31 41 24.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Els Callens Sandra Cacic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1482 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.22
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1534 121.2 — — — — +55 — — 36.0% -0.92 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — -0.02
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1617 134.8 — — — — +7 -51 — 43.9% -0.56 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 103.5 -0.15
20 1991 1509 97.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.24 1995 1602 122.7 — — — — +22 -68 — 40.9% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.03
21 1992 1493 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 1996 1569 120.7 — — — — +101 -123 — 43.5% -0.54 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.01
22 1993 1514 102.8 — — — — +47 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 — — +0.46 1997 1582 124.7 — — — — +81 — +18 43.6% -0.62 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 96.6 -0.41
23 1994 1561 113.2 — — — — +25 — — 56.3% +0.63 1–1 1–0 — -0.16 1998 1556 129.8 — — — — +49 -109 — 35.2% -1.04 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) 96.6 -0.12
24 1995 1551 116.0 — — — — -68 +43 +105 45.2% -0.24 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.58 1999 1509 93.4 — — — — +60 -82 — 23.5% -2.18 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.42
25 1996 1692 128.2 — — — — -52 -110 +3 48.1% -0.30 4–2 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 +0.50 2000 1505 103.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.19
26 1997 1579 109.4 — — — — +17 -21 +72 33.3% -1.26 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.4 +0.32 2001 1578 126.4 — — — — +38 -178 — 41.3% -0.54 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.74
27 1998 1525 102.8 — — — — +21 — — 34.8% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — +0.31 2002 1565 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.02
28 1999 1570 122.3 — — — — -17 +45 — 44.4% -0.08 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.02 2003 1548 101.1 — — — — +35 — — 28.6% -0.57 1–0 0–2 — +0.14
29 2000 1565 124.4 — — — — +8 +10 -5 44.9% -0.06 1–6 (14%) 2–4 (33%) 93.3 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 1523 118.1 — — — — +25 +26 — 33.3% -0.72 0–2 0–2 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1606 123.2 — — — — +7 -75 -6 42.6% -0.40 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 105.1 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 1637 127.2 -0.92 -1.45 0.759 44.5% +8 -178 +36 41.1% -0.48 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 1539 102.6 -1.13 -2.60 0.779 44.6% +15 -107 +61 33.3% -1.44 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.1 -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1522 96.0 -1.14 -3.36 0.793 46.2% +16 — — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1716 123.9 -1.05 -2.22 0.772 44.7% -2 -39 +39 41.1% -0.57 30–36 (45%) 22–25 (47%) 98.5 -0.12 — 1731 130.9 — — — — +50 -93 +18 39.1% -0.75 23–23 (50%) 14–17 (45%) 102.9 -0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.