H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Els Callens vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 0-1

Sandra Cecchini holds a 1–0 lead over Els Callens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1994 Moscow quarterfinal 6-4 2-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Els Callens
BEL Age 56 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Cecchini #47 6-4 2-6 6-3 Els Callens #121 Match data Sep 24, 1994* QF Moscow Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Els Callens #473 #43 582 1,715 83 128 39.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,936 300 217 58.0% 0 0 0 2 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Els Callens Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1991 1–1 50.0% #168 1,509 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1992 0–1 0.0% #231 1,492 0 0 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,633 0 3
22 1993 2–1 66.7% #188 1,513 0 0 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,859 0 5
23 1994 4–3 57.1% #110 1,560 0 0 1988 34–15 69.4% #21 1,843 0 7
24 1995 8–11 42.1% #95 1,551 0 0 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1996 13–12 52.0% #51 1,692 0 0 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,814 0 9
26 1997 8–16 33.3% #98 1,579 0 0 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,773 0 10
27 1998 2–8 20.0% #102 1,525 0 0 1992 24–16 60.0% #34 1,823 0 11
28 1999 7–9 43.8% #82 1,569 0 0 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,726 0 11
29 2000 8–13 38.1% #100 1,564 0 0 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 2001 2–6 25.0% #177 1,522 0 0 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 2002 9–10 47.4% #67 1,606 0 0 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,628 0 11
32 2003 13–19 40.6% #73 1,637 0 0 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,608 0 11
33 2004 5–15 25.0% #122 1,539 0 0 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,555 0 11
34 2005 1–3 25.0% #224 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Els Callens Sandra Cecchini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 12 4 16 75.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1991 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1992 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1987 8 4 12 66.7% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1994 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 29 8 37 78.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1997 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 21 9 30 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2000 5 6 11 45.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1994 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
30 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2002 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
32 2003 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 1997 — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
33 2004 3 9 12 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 26 49 75 34.7% 15 29 44 34.1% 19 23 42 45.2% 23 27 50 46.0% — 40 42 82 48.8% 236 140 376 62.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 21 26 47 44.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Els Callens Sandra Cecchini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1478 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1484 101.9 — — — — — +37 — 44.4% +0.11 1–0 — — +0.65
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1497 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.17
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1651 123.3 — — — — +49 -79 -56 53.9% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 +2.06
20 1991 1509 97.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.24 1985 1747 132.3 — — — — -80 +43 — 51.1% -0.19 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.71
21 1992 1493 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 1986 1633 120.0 — — — — -65 +149 — 43.2% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 96.0 +0.42
22 1993 1514 102.8 — — — — +47 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 — — +0.46 1987 1859 148.1 — — — — -141 +79 — 66.7% +1.10 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.44
23 1994 1561 113.2 — — — — +25 — — 56.3% +0.63 1–1 1–0 — -0.16 1988 1843 145.8 — — — — -149 +157 — 64.2% +1.10 9–2 (82%) 5–2 (71%) 107.7 +2.46
24 1995 1551 116.0 — — — — -68 +43 +105 45.2% -0.24 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.58 1989 1799 128.9 — — — — -134 +134 — 59.4% +0.59 13–7 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 99.8 +3.27
25 1996 1692 128.2 — — — — -52 -110 +3 48.1% -0.30 4–2 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 +0.50 1990 1815 140.5 — — — — -136 +130 — 60.0% +0.83 10–5 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.82
26 1997 1579 109.4 — — — — +17 -21 +72 33.3% -1.26 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.4 +0.32 1991 1774 131.6 — — — — -138 +151 — 61.3% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 +1.96
27 1998 1525 102.8 — — — — +21 — — 34.8% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — +0.31 1992 1824 136.5 — — — — -222 +141 — 55.6% +0.29 8–2 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +0.11
28 1999 1570 122.3 — — — — -17 +45 — 44.4% -0.08 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.02 1993 1727 129.9 — — — — -151 +131 — 53.9% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 101.3 -0.35
29 2000 1565 124.4 — — — — +8 +10 -5 44.9% -0.06 1–6 (14%) 2–4 (33%) 93.3 -0.24 1994 1841 138.9 — — — — -123 +6 — 57.0% +0.51 14–5 (74%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 +0.57
30 2001 1523 118.1 — — — — +25 +26 — 33.3% -0.72 0–2 0–2 — -0.05 1995 1661 113.4 — — — — +36 +34 — 40.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 +0.31
31 2002 1606 123.2 — — — — +7 -75 -6 42.6% -0.40 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 105.1 -0.33 1996 1629 109.5 — — — — +14 +62 — 52.4% +0.05 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.57
32 2003 1637 127.2 -0.92 -1.45 0.759 44.5% +8 -178 +36 41.1% -0.48 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 -1.93 1997 1608 106.4 — — — — — +32 — 39.1% -1.30 0–1 2–0 — -0.39
33 2004 1539 102.6 -1.13 -2.60 0.779 44.6% +15 -107 +61 33.3% -1.44 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.1 -0.15 1998 1555 95.4 — — — — — +15 — 34.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.33
34 2005 1522 96.0 -1.14 -3.36 0.793 46.2% +16 — — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1716 123.9 -1.05 -2.22 0.772 44.7% -2 -39 +39 41.1% -0.57 30–36 (45%) 22–25 (47%) 98.5 -0.12 — 1936 137.9 — — — — -93 +97 -56 55.5% +0.35 98–62 (61%) 42–34 (55%) 106.0 +2.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.