H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Els Callens vs Zina Garrison H2H: 0-1
Zina Garrison holds a 1–0 lead over Els Callens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Zina Garrison leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1995 Birmingham semifinal 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 1995* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Zina Garrison | 6-2 6-1 | Els Callens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Els Callens | #473 | #43 | 582 | 1,716 | 82 | 127 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,142 | 581 | 268 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Els Callens | Zina Garrison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,032 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #188 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,999 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1994 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #110 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1995 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #95 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,021 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1996 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #51 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,130 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,039 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #102 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1999 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #18 | 1,924 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2000 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #100 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 2002 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #67 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | 2003 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #73 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 |
| 33 | 2004 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #224 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |