H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Emanuela Zardo vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 2-0

Emanuela Zardo holds a 2–0 lead over Mercedes Paz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Emanuela Zardo leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Emanuela Zardo won the 1991 Palermo round of 16 6-7 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emanuela Zardo
SUI Age 56 Left-Handed
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Mercedes Paz
ARG Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emanuela Zardo #37 6-7 6-4 7-5 Mercedes Paz #79 Match data Jul 12, 1991* R16 Palermo Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Emanuela Zardo #34 6-3 6-2 Mercedes Paz #53 Match data May 29, 1991* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emanuela Zardo #976 #27 80 1,756 69 75 47.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mercedes Paz #521 #28 185 1,822 145 184 44.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emanuela Zardo Mercedes Paz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1987 0–1 0.0% #258 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1988 0–1 0.0% #283 1,476 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1989 0–3 0.0% #142 1,449 0 0 1985 7–11 38.9% #115 1,526 0 1
20 1990 13–12 52.0% #63 1,593 0 0 1986 22–23 48.9% #60 1,577 0 1
21 1991 17–11 60.7% #31 1,714 0 1 1987 15–20 42.9% #88 1,637 0 1
22 1992 18–15 54.5% #39 1,740 0 1 1988 24–15 61.5% #44 1,779 0 2
23 1993 12–16 42.9% #73 1,650 0 1 1989 13–19 40.6% #91 1,647 0 2
24 1994 9–13 40.9% #89 1,574 0 1 1990 25–20 55.6% #32 1,775 0 3
25 1995 0–3 0.0% #181 1,542 0 1 1991 19–23 45.2% #71 1,683 0 3
26 — — — — — — — 1992 10–19 34.5% #107 1,606 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1993 2–11 15.4% #213 1,491 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 1994 3–10 23.1% #140 1,474 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 1995 4–8 33.3% #164 1,451 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 1996 1–5 16.7% #124 1,442 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emanuela Zardo Mercedes Paz
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1987 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 2 4 6 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 8 10 18 44.4% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1991 1 4 5 20.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 4 4 8 50.0% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 11 5 16 68.8% 13 10 23 56.5% — — — — — — — —
23 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1989 0 6 6 0.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1994 6 5 11 54.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
25 1995 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 8 17 52.9% 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 5 5 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 15 25 40 37.5% 49 38 87 56.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 9 13 30.8% — 41 57 98 41.8% 93 98 191 48.7% 3 12 15 20.0% 8 17 25 32.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emanuela Zardo Mercedes Paz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1987 1488 96.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 1477 101.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 1450 99.4 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 — — +0.13 1985 1526 110.7 — — — — +40 +38 — 40.9% -0.66 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — +0.74
20 1990 1594 122.2 — — — — -34 -2 — 50.9% +0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 102.9 +0.71 1986 1577 119.8 — — — — -30 +125 — 50.5% +0.08 7–10 (41%) 7–3 (70%) 100.7 +3.38
21 1991 1714 136.8 — — — — -190 +100 — 58.1% +0.87 4–2 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 101.3 +0.08 1987 1637 131.6 — — — — -16 +33 — 45.6% -0.18 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 -0.70
22 1992 1741 131.9 — — — — -208 +113 — 51.4% -0.15 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 106.9 -0.32 1988 1780 134.3 — — — — -56 -13 — 57.5% +0.52 7–2 (78%) 4–3 (57%) 106.9 +0.57
23 1993 1651 114.5 — — — — -126 +136 — 41.9% -0.50 4–2 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 104.1 +0.44 1989 1648 125.8 — — — — -60 +126 — 45.9% -0.22 2–8 (20%) 8–7 (53%) 94.4 +0.43
24 1994 1575 109.2 — — — — -11 +87 — 41.7% -0.46 2–2 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 97.3 +1.56 1990 1776 143.2 — — — — -121 +116 — 54.3% +0.15 8–9 (47%) 7–7 (50%) 101.6 -2.36
25 1995 1542 100.6 — — — — -20 — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — -0.22 1991 1684 124.3 — — — — +2 +72 — 45.2% -0.53 5–6 (45%) 6–3 (67%) 102.6 +1.48
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1606 128.7 — — — — -21 +95 — 42.6% -0.54 1–9 (10%) 2–1 (67%) 91.7 -1.41
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1491 102.6 — — — — +47 +87 — 24.1% -1.38 0–5 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.61
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1474 115.3 — — — — +29 +93 — 22.2% -1.81 0–1 1–1 — +0.31
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1452 102.8 — — — — +50 +58 — 36.0% -0.72 0–1 1–1 — +0.83
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1442 97.8 — — — — — +17 — 16.7% -2.67 — 0–1 — +0.03
Career — 1756 126.9 — — — — -99 +89 — 47.0% -0.14 20–13 (61%) 14–17 (45%) 105.2 +1.68 — 1822 131.0 — — — — -28 +76 — 45.9% -0.29 37–61 (38%) 38–33 (54%) 96.4 +1.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.