H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Emanuela Zardo vs Noelle Van Lottum H2H: 2-0
Emanuela Zardo holds a 2–0 lead over Noelle Van Lottum in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Emanuela Zardo leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emanuela Zardo won the 1993 Melbourne third round 6-3 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 1993* | Melbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Emanuela Zardo | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Noelle Van Lottum | Match data |
| May 5, 1991* | Taranto | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Emanuela Zardo | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | Noelle Van Lottum | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emanuela Zardo | #976 | #27 | 80 | 1,765 | 69 | 74 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Noelle Van Lottum | — | — | — | 1,659 | 56 | 96 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emanuela Zardo | Noelle Van Lottum | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1990 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #63 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1991 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #39 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #89 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,427 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 1 |