H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Emiko Okagawa vs Debbie Spence Nasim H2H: 1-0

Emiko Okagawa holds a 1–0 lead over Debbie Spence Nasim in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emiko Okagawa leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Emiko Okagawa won the 1986 Tokyo Pan Pacific round of 32 6-4 6-3.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emiko Okagawa 6-4 6-3 Debbie Spence Nasim Match data Sep 11, 1986* R32 Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emiko Okagawa 1,523 18 39 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Debbie Spence Nasim 1,827 56 62 47.5% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emiko Okagawa Debbie Spence Nasim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–2 33.3% 1,482 0 0 1983 4–2 66.7% 1,565 0 0
16 1981 0–1 0.0% 1,476 0 0 1984 9–7 56.2% 1,649 0 1
17 1982 1–2 33.3% 1,480 0 0 1985 25–19 56.8% 1,777 0 1
18 1983 0–2 0.0% 1,454 0 0 1986 13–22 37.1% 1,619 0 1
19 1984 5–6 45.5% 1,473 0 0 1987 4–11 26.7% 1,554 0 1
20 1985 1–8 11.1% 1,437 0 0
21 1986 3–5 37.5% 1,458 0 0 1989 1–1 50.0% 1,557 0 1
22 1987 4–6 40.0% 1,487 0 0
23 1988 3–4 42.9% 1,488 0 0
25 1990 0–1 0.0% 1,474 0 0
26 1991 0–1 0.0% 1,458 0 0
27 1992 0–1 0.0% 1,447 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emiko Okagawa Debbie Spence Nasim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 4 2 6 66.7%
16 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 8 8 16 50.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
18 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
19 1984 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1987 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1985 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1987 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1988 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1991 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1992 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 12 22 34 35.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 26 27 53 49.1% 25 20 45 55.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 11 16 31.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emiko Okagawa Debbie Spence Nasim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1483 96.2 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 +0.30 1983 1565 107.6 +78 61.5% +0.38 1–0 2–0 +0.32
16 1981 1476 100.7 0.0% -2.50 -0.02 1984 1649 120.5 +26 -52 55.0% +0.22 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.8 +0.47
17 1982 1481 93.6 +51 28.6% -1.72 1–0 -0.03 1985 1777 141.5 -50 -20 54.7% +0.34 7–4 (64%) 3–6 (33%) 103.0 -1.69
18 1983 1454 93.3 0.0% -3.00 +0.41 1986 1619 116.9 -1 +131 -90 35.5% -1.12 5–1 (83%) 3–3 (50%) 105.9 +0.57
19 1984 1474 103.8 +63 +71 50.0% -0.31 1–3 (25%) 2–0 +1.75 1987 1555 115.2 +10 +132 29.0% -1.77 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) -0.23
20 1985 1437 95.8 +60 +70 15.0% -2.70 1–1 1–1 -0.01
21 1986 1458 103.7 +45 45.0% -0.20 1–3 (25%) 0–2 +0.89 1989 1558 101.4 66.7% +2.33 1–0 0–1 +0.20
22 1987 1487 97.6 +53 38.1% -1.48 1–0 5–0 (100%) +1.14
23 1988 1489 93.8 +24 42.9% -1.21 1–0 +1.03
25 1990 1474 94.3 0.0% -4.00 +0.10
26 1991 1458 97.1 33.3% -2.00 0–1 +0.22
27 1992 1447 96.3 0.0% -3.50 +0.06
Career 1524 94.4 +49 +71 35.2% -1.34 5–9 (36%) 10–3 (77%) 103.8 +10.25 1827 129.7 -4 +41 -90 46.5% -0.34 20–10 (67%) 12–13 (48%) 107.8 -0.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.