H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Emiko Okagawa vs Jane Forman H2H: 1-0

Emiko Okagawa holds a 1–0 lead over Jane Forman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emiko Okagawa leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emiko Okagawa won the 1984 Tokyo Borden round of 32 6-2 3-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emiko Okagawa
JPN Age 61
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jane Forman
USA Age 64 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emiko Okagawa 6-2 3-6 7-6 Jane Forman Match data Oct 4, 1984* R32 Tokyo Borden WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emiko Okagawa — — — 1,523 18 39 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jane Forman #380 #161 3 1,573 19 29 39.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emiko Okagawa Jane Forman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–2 33.3% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1983 0–2 0.0% — 1,454 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1984 5–6 45.5% — 1,473 0 0 1981 1–3 25.0% — 1,477 0 0
20 1985 1–8 11.1% — 1,437 0 0 1982 5–5 50.0% — 1,490 0 0
21 1986 3–5 37.5% — 1,458 0 0 1983 1–2 33.3% — 1,494 0 0
22 1987 4–6 40.0% — 1,487 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
23 1988 3–4 42.9% — 1,488 0 0 1985 9–6 60.0% — 1,562 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 1986 2–8 20.0% #169 1,505 0 1
25 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,474 0 0 1987 1–3 25.0% #165 1,510 0 1
26 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,458 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #384 1,506 0 1
27 1992 0–1 0.0% — 1,447 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emiko Okagawa Jane Forman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1982 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 1987 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 22 34 35.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — 3 9 12 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emiko Okagawa Jane Forman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 1476 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 1481 93.6 — — — — +51 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1454 93.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 1474 103.8 — — — — +63 +71 — 50.0% -0.31 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +1.75 1981 1478 105.1 — — — — — — — 45.5% +0.09 0–3 (0%) — — -0.10
20 1985 1437 95.8 — — — — +60 +70 — 15.0% -2.70 1–1 1–1 — -0.01 1982 1490 102.6 — — — — +109 — — 55.0% +0.30 1–1 — — +0.63
21 1986 1458 103.7 — — — — +45 — — 45.0% -0.20 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.89 1983 1494 101.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.50 — 1–0 — +0.18
22 1987 1487 97.6 — — — — +53 — — 38.1% -1.48 1–0 5–0 (100%) — +1.14 1984 1477 98.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.24
23 1988 1489 93.8 — — — — +24 — — 42.9% -1.21 — 1–0 — +1.03 1985 1562 107.4 — — — — — — — 58.1% +0.13 1–0 1–0 — +0.18
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1506 109.0 — — — — -12 — +90 27.3% -1.45 0–2 0–4 (0%) — +0.73
25 1990 1474 94.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.10 1987 1511 101.4 — — — — — — — 22.2% -1.55 1–0 0–2 — +0.04
26 1991 1458 97.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.22 1988 1506 102.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.19
27 1992 1447 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1524 94.4 — — — — +49 +71 — 35.2% -1.34 5–9 (36%) 10–3 (77%) 103.8 +10.25 — 1573 107.9 — — — — +28 — +90 43.3% -0.53 3–7 (30%) 2–7 (22%) 92.2 +3.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.