H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Emiko Okagawa holds a 1–0 lead over Kathrin Keil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emiko Okagawa leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emiko Okagawa won the 1987 San Diego round of 64 2-6 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emiko Okagawa | 2-6 7-6 7-6 | Kathrin Keil | Match data | Aug 5, 1987* | R64 | San Diego | WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emiko Okagawa | — | — | — | 1,523 | 18 | 39 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kathrin Keil | — | — | — | 1,703 | 45 | 55 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emiko Okagawa | Kathrin Keil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Emiko Okagawa | Kathrin Keil | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1980 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1981 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1983 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1984 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1985 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1988 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1986 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 25 | 1990 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 12 | 22 | 34 | 35.3% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | 27 | 32 | 59 | 45.8% | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Emiko Okagawa | Kathrin Keil | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1980 | 1483 | 96.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 42.9% | -1.14 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 1476 | 100.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 1481 | 93.6 | — | — | — | — | +51 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.72 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.03 | 1980 | 1600 | 130.2 | — | — | — | — | +65 | — | — | 64.7% | +1.29 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–1 | — | -0.44 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1454 | 93.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.41 | 1981 | 1616 | 117.2 | — | — | — | — | +61 | — | — | 52.4% | -0.12 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–1 (80%) | 101.5 | -0.42 |
| 19 | 1984 | 1474 | 103.8 | — | — | — | — | +63 | +71 | — | 50.0% | -0.31 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–0 | — | +1.75 | 1982 | 1637 | 111.3 | — | — | — | — | — | -54 | — | 53.8% | +0.15 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | -0.08 |
| 20 | 1985 | 1437 | 95.8 | — | — | — | — | +60 | +70 | — | 15.0% | -2.70 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.01 | 1983 | 1634 | 108.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.21 |
| 21 | 1986 | 1458 | 103.7 | — | — | — | — | +45 | — | — | 45.0% | -0.20 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–2 | — | +0.89 | 1984 | 1602 | 104.8 | — | — | — | — | +49 | -40 | — | 42.4% | -0.55 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–3 (40%) | 100.2 | +1.11 |
| 22 | 1987 | 1487 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | +53 | — | — | 38.1% | -1.48 | 1–0 | 5–0 (100%) | — | +1.14 | 1985 | 1587 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.09 |
| 23 | 1988 | 1489 | 93.8 | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | — | 42.9% | -1.21 | — | 1–0 | — | +1.03 | 1986 | 1606 | 111.2 | — | — | — | — | — | -14 | — | 69.2% | +1.23 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +1.24 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1631 | 122.6 | — | — | — | — | +57 | — | -81 | 43.3% | -0.61 | 6–3 (67%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.7 | +0.32 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1474 | 94.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.10 | 1988 | 1579 | 111.1 | — | — | — | — | +11 | — | — | 28.1% | -1.84 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–0 | — | -1.26 |
| 26 | 1991 | 1458 | 97.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.22 | 1989 | 1536 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | -1 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.08 | 1–1 | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.46 |
| 27 | 1992 | 1447 | 96.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1524 | 94.4 | — | — | — | — | +49 | +71 | — | 35.2% | -1.34 | 5–9 (36%) | 10–3 (77%) | 103.8 | +10.25 | — | 1704 | 122.0 | — | — | — | — | +43 | -34 | -81 | 44.9% | -0.47 | 20–16 (56%) | 14–12 (54%) | 103.5 | +0.81 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriana Villagran Reami | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 16, 1986 | H2H |
| Kristin Kinney | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 25, 1985 | H2H |
| Julie Harrington | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 14, 1982 | H2H |
| Sara Gomer | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 6, 1987 | H2H |
| Gigi Fernandez | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 23, 1986 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 31, 1988 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 4, 1988 | H2H |
| Beth Herr | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 3, 1987 | H2H |
| Louise Field | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 27, 1989 | H2H |
| Stephanie Rehe | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 14, 1988 | H2H |