H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Emiko Okagawa vs Kathrin Keil H2H: 1-0
Emiko Okagawa holds a 1–0 lead over Kathrin Keil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emiko Okagawa leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emiko Okagawa won the 1987 San Diego second round 2-6 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 1987* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Emiko Okagawa | 2-6 7-6 7-6 | Kathrin Keil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emiko Okagawa | — | — | — | 1,523 | 18 | 39 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kathrin Keil | — | — | — | 1,703 | 45 | 55 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emiko Okagawa | Kathrin Keil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |