H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Emiko Okagawa vs Maya Kidowaki H2H: 0-1
Maya Kidowaki holds a 1–0 lead over Emiko Okagawa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maya Kidowaki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maya Kidowaki won the 1992 Taipei third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 61
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 57
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1992* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Maya Kidowaki | 6-1 6-4 | Emiko Okagawa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emiko Okagawa | — | — | — | 1,523 | 18 | 39 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maya Kidowaki | #594 | #68 | 17 | 1,659 | 34 | 56 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emiko Okagawa | Maya Kidowaki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #138 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #93 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #73 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #148 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #200 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #553 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |