H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Emiko Okagawa vs Radomira Zrubakova H2H: 0-1
Radomira Zrubakova holds a 1–0 lead over Emiko Okagawa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Radomira Zrubakova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Radomira Zrubakova won the 1988 Australian Open third round 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 61
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 55
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 1988* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Radomira Zrubakova | 6-0 6-0 | Emiko Okagawa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emiko Okagawa | — | — | — | 1,523 | 18 | 39 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Radomira Zrubakova | #788 | #22 | 324 | 1,896 | 171 | 155 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emiko Okagawa | Radomira Zrubakova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #32 | 1,807 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1984 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #57 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1986 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |