H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Emiko Okagawa vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 0-1

Sandra Cecchini holds a 1–0 lead over Emiko Okagawa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1984 Rio de Janeiro quarterfinal 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emiko Okagawa
JPN Age 61
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Cecchini #53 6-2 6-1 Emiko Okagawa Match data Jul 14, 1984* QF Rio de Janeiro WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emiko Okagawa — — — 1,523 18 39 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,936 300 217 58.0% 0 0 0 2 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emiko Okagawa Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–2 33.3% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,480 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 1983 0–2 0.0% — 1,454 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 0
19 1984 5–6 45.5% — 1,473 0 0 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1985 1–8 11.1% — 1,437 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1986 3–5 37.5% — 1,458 0 0 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,633 0 3
22 1987 4–6 40.0% — 1,487 0 0 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,859 0 5
23 1988 3–4 42.9% — 1,488 0 0 1988 34–15 69.4% #21 1,843 0 7
24 — — — — — — — 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,474 0 0 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,814 0 9
26 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,458 0 0 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,773 0 10
27 1992 0–1 0.0% — 1,447 0 0 1992 24–16 60.0% #34 1,823 0 11
28 — — — — — — — 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,726 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,628 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,608 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,555 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emiko Okagawa Sandra Cecchini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1984 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 12 4 16 75.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1985 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 1987 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 8 4 12 66.7% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 29 8 37 78.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 21 9 30 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 22 34 35.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — 40 42 82 48.8% 236 140 376 62.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 21 26 47 44.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emiko Okagawa Sandra Cecchini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 1476 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.02 1981 1478 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
17 1982 1481 93.6 — — — — +51 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 — — -0.03 1982 1484 101.9 — — — — — +37 — 44.4% +0.11 1–0 — — +0.65
18 1983 1454 93.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.41 1983 1497 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.17
19 1984 1474 103.8 — — — — +63 +71 — 50.0% -0.31 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +1.75 1984 1651 123.3 — — — — +49 -79 -56 53.9% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 +2.06
20 1985 1437 95.8 — — — — +60 +70 — 15.0% -2.70 1–1 1–1 — -0.01 1985 1747 132.3 — — — — -80 +43 — 51.1% -0.19 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.71
21 1986 1458 103.7 — — — — +45 — — 45.0% -0.20 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.89 1986 1633 120.0 — — — — -65 +149 — 43.2% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 96.0 +0.42
22 1987 1487 97.6 — — — — +53 — — 38.1% -1.48 1–0 5–0 (100%) — +1.14 1987 1859 148.1 — — — — -141 +79 — 66.7% +1.10 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.44
23 1988 1489 93.8 — — — — +24 — — 42.9% -1.21 — 1–0 — +1.03 1988 1843 145.8 — — — — -149 +157 — 64.2% +1.10 9–2 (82%) 5–2 (71%) 107.7 +2.46
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1799 128.9 — — — — -134 +134 — 59.4% +0.59 13–7 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 99.8 +3.27
25 1990 1474 94.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.10 1990 1815 140.5 — — — — -136 +130 — 60.0% +0.83 10–5 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.82
26 1991 1458 97.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.22 1991 1774 131.6 — — — — -138 +151 — 61.3% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 +1.96
27 1992 1447 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.06 1992 1824 136.5 — — — — -222 +141 — 55.6% +0.29 8–2 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +0.11
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1727 129.9 — — — — -151 +131 — 53.9% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 101.3 -0.35
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1841 138.9 — — — — -123 +6 — 57.0% +0.51 14–5 (74%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 +0.57
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1661 113.4 — — — — +36 +34 — 40.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 +0.31
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1629 109.5 — — — — +14 +62 — 52.4% +0.05 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.57
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1608 106.4 — — — — — +32 — 39.1% -1.30 0–1 2–0 — -0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1555 95.4 — — — — — +15 — 34.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.33
Career — 1524 94.4 — — — — +49 +71 — 35.2% -1.34 5–9 (36%) 10–3 (77%) 103.8 +10.25 — 1936 137.9 — — — — -93 +97 -56 55.5% +0.35 98–62 (61%) 42–34 (55%) 106.0 +2.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.