H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Emiko Okagawa vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 0-1

Sandra Cecchini holds a 1–0 lead over Emiko Okagawa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1984 Rio de Janeiro quarterfinal 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emiko Okagawa
Age 61
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 14, 1984* Rio de Janeiro WTA 250 QF Hard Sandra Cecchini #53 6-2 6-1 Emiko Okagawa Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Emiko Okagawa — — — 1,523 18 39 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emiko Okagawa Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–2 33.3% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,481 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1983 0–2 0.0% — 1,454 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1984 5–6 45.5% — 1,473 0 0 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1985 1–8 11.1% — 1,436 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1986 3–5 37.5% — 1,457 0 0 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1987 4–6 40.0% — 1,486 0 0 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1988 3–4 42.9% — 1,488 0 0 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 — — — — — — — 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,474 0 0 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,458 0 0 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 1992 0–1 0.0% — 1,447 0 0 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 — — — — — — — 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11