H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 04:37 UTC

Emiliana Arango vs Venus Williams H2H: 1-0

Emiliana Arango holds a 1–0 lead over Venus Williams in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emiliana Arango leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emiliana Arango won the 2026 Cincinnati Open first round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emiliana Arango
Colombia Age 25 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
United States Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emiliana Arango #97 6-2 6-2 Venus Williams #469 Match data Aug 14, 2026 R128 Cincinnati Open WTA 1000 Hard

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Emiliana Arango #97 #46 1,229 1,700 31 46 40.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Venus Williams #469 #1 7,452 2,370 781 297 72.4% 7 1 9 1 20 10 48

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emiliana Arango Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,526 0 0
15 2016 0–1 0.0% #825 1,484 0 0 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 2017 0–1 0.0% #502 1,467 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,570 0 0
17 2018 2–1 66.7% #405 1,488 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,831 0 0
18 2019 0–1 0.0% #545 1,476 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,092 0 2
19 — — — — — — — 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,260 0 8
20 2021 0–1 0.0% #240 1,480 0 0 2000 41–4 91.1% #3 2,342 2 14
21 — — — — — — — 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,360 4 20
22 2023 7–4 63.6% #116 1,622 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,304 4 27
23 2024 3–7 30.0% #169 1,557 0 0 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,261 4 28
24 2025 11–15 42.3% #49 1,650 0 0 2004 42–14 75.0% #9 2,078 4 30
25 2026 8–15 34.8% #97 1,637 0 0 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,128 5 32
26 — — — — — — — 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,035 5 32
27 — — — — — — — 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,059 6 35
28 — — — — — — — 2008 40–11 78.4% #6 2,138 7 38
29 — — — — — — — 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,988 7 40
30 — — — — — — — 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,061 7 42
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 2,017 7 42
32 — — — — — — — 2012 24–9 72.7% #24 2,016 7 43
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,910 7 43
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,880 7 44
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,969 7 47
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–15 61.5% #17 1,815 7 48
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,939 7 48
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,871 7 48
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,818 7 48
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,711 7 48
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,645 7 48
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,601 7 48
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,592 7 48

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emiliana Arango Venus Williams
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
15 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
16 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 2018 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1997 15 7 22 68.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 2019 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 35 8 43 81.4% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 34 5 39 87.2% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
20 2021 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 25 0 25 100.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 32 3 35 91.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 0 7 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2023 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 35 5 40 87.5% 14 2 16 87.5% 6 1 7 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9%
23 2024 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 8 2 10 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
24 2025 9 10 19 47.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 21 9 30 70.0% 17 2 19 89.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 2026 2 8 10 20.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 18 7 25 72.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 27 5 32 84.4% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 29 9 38 76.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 21 11 32 65.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 19 3 22 86.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 14 3 17 82.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 12 8 20 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 27 11 38 71.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 34 10 44 77.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 26 11 37 70.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 19 24 43 44.2% 11 18 29 37.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — 486 187 673 72.2% 163 69 232 70.3% 98 27 125 78.4% 34 14 48 70.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 76/77 of Emiliana Arango's and 580/731 of Venus Williams's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Emiliana Arango Venus Williams
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2016 1/1 1.0 5.0 60.0% 52.4% 7.1% 28.6% 0.0% 34.3% 27.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2017 1/1 1.0 3.0 66.7% 44.1% 29.4% 14.3% 22.2% 39.2% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2018 3/3 0.3 2.0 75.5% 53.0% 33.5% 51.5% 50.7% 48.2% 48.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2019 1/1 1.0 1.0 59.3% 51.4% 37.5% 60.0% 33.3% 45.8% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2021 1/1 1.0 11.0 64.3% 63.9% 40.0% 70.0% 45.5% 55.4% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2023 11/11 0.8 3.5 66.9% 61.5% 45.0% 51.3% 47.8% 56.4% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2024 10/10 0.7 3.8 71.8% 57.6% 37.9% 49.6% 46.4% 51.3% 43.1% 2003 11/29 3.8 5.8 55.2% 76.2% 43.8% 53.3% 47.0% 61.6% 51.3%
24 2025 25/26 0.8 2.8 70.4% 55.3% 43.3% 52.9% 48.4% 52.2% 46.9% 2004 13/56 4.1 4.5 59.4% 72.2% 46.7% 41.6% 50.5% 61.9% 50.1%
25 2026 23/23 0.8 2.1 70.6% 57.2% 43.8% 46.4% 40.4% 53.5% 44.3% 2005 18/44 2.9 4.2 64.4% 70.7% 45.1% 63.1% 52.0% 61.3% 50.1%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 16/19 3.1 4.3 62.7% 68.3% 47.0% 52.8% 45.6% 60.6% 48.5%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 53/56 3.6 5.3 59.4% 72.6% 46.6% 56.6% 51.8% 62.2% 48.6%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 43/51 4.3 4.3 61.6% 72.0% 48.4% 55.6% 48.9% 62.7% 47.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 48/54 5.4 4.7 57.3% 73.4% 49.9% 59.5% 51.4% 63.3% 46.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 44/45 4.6 4.5 56.7% 73.5% 46.9% 53.7% 49.0% 61.9% 47.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 9/12 6.0 2.8 64.4% 72.3% 51.7% 60.3% 45.5% 64.5% 45.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 28/33 4.5 4.8 53.9% 68.9% 47.8% 50.7% 50.7% 59.2% 46.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 23/26 2.8 4.6 56.9% 65.4% 43.4% 55.0% 50.8% 56.0% 47.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 44/48 4.7 4.4 55.7% 71.6% 46.0% 56.6% 53.0% 60.4% 46.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 35/53 4.6 2.9 58.6% 70.6% 49.7% 50.2% 48.0% 62.1% 45.0%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 37/39 3.1 3.9 61.5% 65.5% 48.1% 52.8% 52.7% 58.4% 46.8%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 46/53 3.5 5.2 60.9% 69.2% 46.3% 59.1% 46.0% 60.2% 46.0%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 26/26 2.1 4.9 60.5% 63.9% 46.4% 53.6% 51.3% 56.7% 43.8%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 34/35 1.8 3.7 63.2% 63.3% 43.3% 54.0% 45.9% 56.0% 43.6%
40 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 9/9 3.2 7.0 58.3% 63.2% 42.3% 61.2% 45.9% 54.5% 41.2%
41 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 12/12 3.4 4.4 62.1% 60.7% 37.2% 48.3% 44.1% 51.7% 39.2%
42 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 4/4 3.3 8.5 56.5% 65.1% 31.3% 49.0% 29.6% 50.4% 34.9%
43 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 10/10 3.6 4.4 60.1% 64.2% 38.7% 43.3% 39.2% 54.0% 40.5%
44 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 2/2 4.5 8.0 59.1% 60.9% 29.6% 49.4% 70.0% 47.9% 40.9%
45 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 4/4 3.5 5.5 54.2% 62.5% 31.3% 31.2% 48.2% 48.5% 40.7%
46 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 11/11 3.3 4.3 59.8% 63.1% 37.7% 45.6% 44.8% 53.3% 36.7%
Career — 76/77 0.8 2.9 69.9% 56.8% 41.8% 49.7% 44.5% 52.5% 45.3% — 580/1,078 3.8 4.5 59.3% 69.4% 46.1% 54.4% 49.2% 59.8% 46.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emiliana Arango Venus Williams
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1526 122.1 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — -0.30
15 2016 1484 91.5 -2.51 -2.53 0.418 30.7% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — +0.09 1995 1561 123.9 — — — — +30 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 -0.50
16 2017 1467 96.4 -3.59 -2.70 0.705 41.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — +0.19 1996 1570 134.2 — — — — +31 — — 46.7% +0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–0 -0.73
17 2018 1489 104.7 -1.46 -1.18 0.932 48.2% — +43 — 80.0% +2.00 1–0 1–0 +0.46 1997 1831 160.2 — — — — +5 -255 -229 55.8% +0.44 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) -2.67
18 2019 1476 97.0 -0.97 -4.23 0.813 44.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — +0.07 1998 2092 173.9 — — — — +6 -323 -377 75.8% +2.05 8–4 (67%) 4–3 (57%) -2.13
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 2261 178.9 — — — — +6 -313 -473 78.4% +1.91 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) -5.78
20 2021 1481 98.2 -1.17 -3.37 0.922 48.6% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — +0.03 2000 2343 171.5 — — — — +17 -403 -323 84.0% +2.34 8–2 (80%) 6–3 (67%) -2.96
21 2022 1499 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 2361 172.4 — — — — +33 -382 -130 83.8% +2.48 8–1 (89%) 10–3 (77%) -1.50
22 2023 1623 117.1 +0.06 +1.55 1.077 51.4% -13 — — 59.1% +0.50 1–1 1–0 +0.83 2002 2304 175.2 — — — — +59 -206 -11 81.3% +2.44 12–4 (75%) 7–3 (70%) -2.29
23 2024 1557 108.6 -4.13 -1.19 0.885 47.0% -2 +54 — 34.8% -1.17 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) -0.08 2003 2261 155.8 +4.06 +5.13 1.337 56.1% +108 -163 +33 81.0% +2.37 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) -1.73
24 2025 1650 129.5 -2.84 +2.08 0.982 49.5% +14 -55 — 39.7% -0.44 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) +0.68 2004 2078 159.0 +4.27 +3.93 1.315 55.7% +60 +131 — 75.7% +1.99 6–3 (67%) 8–6 (57%) +0.61
25 2026 1638 116.7 -2.78 +0.42 0.951 48.8% -6 -59 -102 40.7% -0.70 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) +0.49 2005 2128 165.4 +4.52 +4.90 1.293 55.5% +29 +38 +223 75.0% +2.03 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) -3.16
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 2035 136.6 +3.30 +3.85 1.231 54.0% +67 +87 +281 63.8% +0.94 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) -0.42
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2059 153.9 +5.55 +3.98 1.286 55.2% +32 +23 +331 79.0% +2.10 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) -1.23
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2138 163.5 +7.00 +3.95 1.260 54.6% -5 -109 +293 74.6% +1.81 7–5 (58%) 5–6 (45%) -2.09
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1989 162.7 +7.24 +2.88 1.255 54.5% +47 -3 +361 65.1% +1.53 13–10 (57%) 3–12 (20%) -2.72
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 2062 156.7 +5.33 +3.88 1.244 54.7% +31 -11 +294 79.6% +1.80 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) +0.82
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2018 120.4 +4.82 +1.85 1.287 54.7% +52 — +278 70.8% +1.58 3–1 (75%) 0–2 +0.19
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2016 150.4 +3.65 +3.04 1.127 52.6% +82 +19 +154 65.4% +1.15 9–3 (75%) 5–5 (50%) -1.99
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1911 141.0 +0.75 +3.14 1.071 51.5% +85 +50 — 58.1% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 2–4 (33%) -0.82
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1880 149.6 +4.15 +2.82 1.178 53.5% +51 +7 +267 66.4% +1.21 10–11 (48%) 5–6 (45%) -0.89
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1970 157.3 +3.80 +3.44 1.187 53.2% +40 -131 +137 67.2% +1.27 13–4 (76%) 10–5 (67%) -1.00
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1816 132.9 +2.07 +3.27 1.126 52.8% +11 +16 +296 62.0% +0.67 5–9 (36%) 11–4 (73%) +1.04
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1940 149.4 +3.47 +3.28 1.155 53.0% -13 -81 +233 67.8% +1.01 11–6 (65%) 11–3 (79%) -0.48
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1872 141.1 +0.84 +1.05 1.013 50.4% +41 -80 +242 54.0% +0.33 7–4 (64%) 3–3 (50%) +0.45
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1818 145.3 +0.34 +1.09 0.992 50.0% +36 -40 +252 51.9% +0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) -1.81
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1712 125.8 +0.01 -0.68 0.905 48.2% +47 — — 27.3% -1.14 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) -1.02
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1646 111.2 -2.68 -2.15 0.811 45.9% +77 -8 — 29.6% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 0–2 -0.73
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1601 107.5 -2.84 -1.19 0.703 43.0% +65 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 +0.11
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1592 114.4 -0.99 -0.36 0.880 47.2% +56 — +452 40.0% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 3–1 (75%) -0.08
Career — 1700 120.7 -2.48 +0.66 0.952 48.8% +2 -25 -102 41.5% -0.56 10–12 (45%) 7–6 (54%) +3.63 — 2370 167.2 +3.56 +2.77 1.146 52.9% +33 -77 +111 69.0% +1.40 184–125 (60%) 137–100 (58%) -3.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.