H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Emilse Raponi Longo vs Petra Huber H2H: 0-1

Petra Huber holds a 1–0 lead over Emilse Raponi Longo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Petra Huber leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Huber won the 1984 Miami Open round of 32 6-2 6-2.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Petra Huber #94 6-2 6-2 Emilse Raponi Longo Match data Apr 5, 1984* R32 Miami Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emilse Raponi Longo 1,593 32 62 34.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Petra Huber #458 #37 13 1,737 58 79 42.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emilse Raponi Longo Petra Huber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1973 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0
16 1982 4–2 66.7% 1,563 0 1
17 1975 0–2 0.0% 1,453 0 0 1983 4–6 40.0% 1,596 0 1
18 1984 12–14 46.2% #48 1,652 0 1
19 1985 10–15 40.0% #53 1,631 0 1
20 1978 4–2 66.7% 1,531 0 0 1986 14–14 50.0% #63 1,625 0 2
21 1979 5–6 45.5% 1,569 0 0 1987 11–14 44.0% #84 1,652 0 2
22 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,559 0 0 1988 3–13 18.8% #178 1,519 0 2
23 1989 0–1 0.0% #444 1,514 0 2
25 1983 3–7 30.0% 1,572 0 0
26 1984 11–13 45.8% 1,577 0 0
27 1985 6–14 30.0% 1,504 0 0
28 1986 2–7 22.2% 1,471 0 0
29 1987 1–6 14.3% 1,444 0 0
30 1988 0–3 0.0% 1,409 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emilse Raponi Longo Petra Huber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1973 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1982 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1975 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1984 6 6 12 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1985 1 6 7 14.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 1978 4 1 5 80.0% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 10 10 20 50.0%
22 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 0 4 4 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
23 1989 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
26 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1985 3 6 9 33.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
29 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
30 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 12 19 31 38.7% 20 39 59 33.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 27 37 27.0% 45 41 86 52.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 8 11 27.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emilse Raponi Longo Petra Huber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1973 1484 93.6 0.0% -5.00 +0.24
16 1982 1564 115.4 +61 60.0% +1.70 0–1 +0.15
17 1975 1453 94.3 0.0% -2.75 0–1 +0.52 1983 1597 121.2 -52 +132 45.8% -0.54 1–3 (25%) +0.57
18 1984 1653 126.1 -47 +62 46.8% +0.15 5–5 (50%) 1–1 +1.10
19 1985 1631 127.0 -93 +117 40.4% -0.21 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 100.6 +0.22
20 1978 1531 110.5 +38 54.5% +0.36 1–0 1–0 +0.10 1986 1626 120.8 -93 +110 50.8% -0.03 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 99.5 +1.87
21 1979 1570 118.7 +79 44.0% -0.12 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.0 +0.65 1987 1652 141.2 -127 +79 47.4% -0.19 2–5 (29%) 4–2 (67%) 97.3 -1.91
22 1980 1560 101.2 33.3% -1.67 0–1 -0.19 1988 1520 111.0 -64 +79 29.7% -1.40 0–5 (0%) 1–2 (33%) -0.13
23 1989 1515 100.5 0.0% -3.50 -0.23
25 1983 1572 126.8 +68 39.1% -0.91 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 96.0 -0.45
26 1984 1578 106.1 +16 +21 46.4% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +3.03
27 1985 1505 102.3 +47 -9 39.1% -0.70 0–6 (0%) 0–6 (0%) 89.0 +2.07
28 1986 1472 93.5 -22 23.8% -2.00 2–1 (67%) 0–1 +0.29
29 1987 1445 95.9 -32 18.8% -2.63 1–1 1–1 +0.05
30 1988 1409 89.1 14.3% -2.71 0–1 0–1 +0.38
Career 1594 108.1 +27 +22 37.4% -0.97 10–18 (36%) 6–17 (26%) 89.7 +7.12 1737 132.3 -76 +93 44.6% -0.22 16–26 (38%) 10–12 (45%) 94.8 +1.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.