H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Emma Davis vs Mari Moya H2H: 1-0

Emma Davis holds a 1–0 lead over Mari Moya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emma Davis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Emma Davis won the 2016 Madrid Open third round 6-2 6-3.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emma Davis 6-2 6-3 Mari Moya Match data May 5, 2016 R16 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emma Davis 1,516 1 0 100.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mari Moya 1,500 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Emma Davis Mari Moya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
2016 1–0 100.0% 1,516 0 0 2016 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Emma Davis Mari Moya
Yr Clay Yr Clay
W L M Win % W L M Win %
2016 1 0 1 100.0% 2016 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 1 0 1 100.0% Career 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Emma Davis Mari Moya
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
2016 1/1 2.0 6.0 59.3% 74.3% 37.5% 66.7% 66.7% 59.3% 55.7% 2016 1/1 0.0 6.0 34.4% 38.1% 47.5% 33.3% 33.3% 44.3% 40.7%
Career 1/1 2.0 6.0 59.3% 74.3% 37.5% 66.7% 66.7% 59.3% 55.7% Career 1/1 0.0 6.0 34.4% 38.1% 47.5% 33.3% 33.3% 44.3% 40.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Emma Davis Mari Moya
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
2016 1516 103.5 0.00 0.00 1.370 57.5% 100.0% +3.50 0.00 2016 1484 96.5 0.00 0.00 0.730 42.5% 0.0% -3.50 0.00
2018 1508 98.7
Career 1516 101.1 0.00 0.00 1.370 57.5% 100.0% +3.50 0.00 Career 1500 98.2 0.00 0.00 0.730 42.5% 0.0% -3.50 0.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.