H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Emma Navarro vs Sorana Cirstea H2H: 1-1
Emma Navarro and Sorana Cirstea are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Emma Navarro won the 2025 Indian Wells second round 3-6 6-1 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 25
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 36
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2025 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Emma Navarro | 3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | Sorana Cirstea | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2025 | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Sorana Cirstea | 7-6(5) 3-6 7-5 | Emma Navarro | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emma Navarro | #26 | #8 | 3,879 | 1,997 | 110 | 81 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Sorana Cirstea | #17 | #17 | 2,535 | 2,024 | 373 | 343 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emma Navarro | Sorana Cirstea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #353 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #466 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #45 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #242 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #93 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #60 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #27 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2024 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #22 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2025 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #15 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #242 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #79 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #84 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #74 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #71 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #39 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #26 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #69 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #43 | 1,870 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 30–11 | 73.2% | #17 | 1,985 | 0 | 4 |