H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Emma Raducanu vs Camila Giorgi H2H: 0-1
Camila Giorgi holds a 1–0 lead over Emma Raducanu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camila Giorgi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camila Giorgi won the 2022 Toronto second round 7-6(0) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 23
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2022* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Camila Giorgi | 7-6(0) 6-2 | Emma Raducanu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emma Raducanu | #38 | #10 | 2,975 | 1,950 | 90 | 72 | 55.6% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Camila Giorgi | #116 | #26 | 1,978 | 1,875 | 204 | 184 | 52.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emma Raducanu | Camila Giorgi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2021 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,723 | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #78 | 1,731 | 1 | 1 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2023 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #298 | 1,751 | 1 | 1 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2024 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #56 | 1,835 | 1 | 1 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2025 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #29 | 1,876 | 1 | 1 | 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2026 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #38 | 1,834 | 1 | 1 | 2015 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #78 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #100 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #76 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #66 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #53 | 1,788 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #116 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |