H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Emma Raducanu vs Yanina Wickmayer H2H: 1-0
Emma Raducanu holds a 1–0 lead over Yanina Wickmayer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emma Raducanu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emma Raducanu won the 2022 Seoul fourth round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 23
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 36
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2022* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Emma Raducanu | 6-3 7-5 | Yanina Wickmayer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emma Raducanu | #38 | #10 | 2,975 | 1,950 | 90 | 72 | 55.6% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Yanina Wickmayer | #765 | #12 | 3,320 | 1,932 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emma Raducanu | Yanina Wickmayer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2021 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,723 | 1 | 1 | 2008 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2022 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #78 | 1,731 | 1 | 1 | 2009 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2023 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #298 | 1,751 | 1 | 1 | 2010 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2024 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #56 | 1,835 | 1 | 1 | 2011 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2025 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #29 | 1,876 | 1 | 1 | 2012 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #23 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2026 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #38 | 1,834 | 1 | 1 | 2013 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #51 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #75 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #41 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #58 | 1,574 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #115 | 1,624 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #122 | 1,637 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #152 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #321 | 1,554 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,530 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,500 | 0 | 5 |