H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Emmanuelle Gagliardi vs Fang Li H2H: 0-1
Fang Li holds a 1–0 lead over Emmanuelle Gagliardi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fang Li leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fang Li won the 1995 Surabaya third round 6-2 3-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 50
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 1995* | Surabaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Fang Li | 6-2 3-6 6-0 | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emmanuelle Gagliardi | #736 | #42 | 781 | 1,695 | 117 | 182 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Fang Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #101 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #95 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #61 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #56 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #105 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #115 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #131 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,401 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |