H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Emmanuelle Gagliardi vs Flora Perfetti H2H: 1-1
Emmanuelle Gagliardi and Flora Perfetti are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Flora Perfetti won the 1998 Rome second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 50
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 57
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 1998* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Flora Perfetti | 7-5 6-2 | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Match data |
| Jul 17, 1997* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | 6-0 6-3 | Flora Perfetti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emmanuelle Gagliardi | #736 | #42 | 781 | 1,695 | 117 | 182 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Flora Perfetti | #415 | #54 | 419 | 1,600 | 31 | 59 | 34.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Flora Perfetti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #101 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #95 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #108 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #315 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #61 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2003 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #56 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #105 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #69 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #102 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #115 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #131 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #225 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,401 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |