H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Emmanuelle Gagliardi vs Janette Husarova H2H: 2-0
Emmanuelle Gagliardi holds a 2–0 lead over Janette Husarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Emmanuelle Gagliardi leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emmanuelle Gagliardi won the 2002 Indian Wells third round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 50
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 52
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2002* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | 6-2 6-0 | Janette Husarova | Match data |
| Jan 3, 2002* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | 6-1 6-1 | Janette Husarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emmanuelle Gagliardi | #736 | #42 | 781 | 1,695 | 117 | 182 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Janette Husarova | #1,055 | #31 | 1,006 | 1,737 | 79 | 109 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Janette Husarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #82 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #145 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #101 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #95 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #375 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #127 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #61 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #56 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #149 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #105 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #115 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #126 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #131 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,401 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #366 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |