H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Emmanuelle Gagliardi vs Michaella Krajicek H2H: 0-1
Michaella Krajicek holds a 1–0 lead over Emmanuelle Gagliardi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michaella Krajicek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Michaella Krajicek won the 2006 Palermo third round 6-1 6-7(3) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 50
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2006* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Michaella Krajicek | 6-1 6-7(3) 7-5 | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emmanuelle Gagliardi | #736 | #42 | 781 | 1,695 | 117 | 182 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michaella Krajicek | #1,134 | #30 | 918 | 1,803 | 89 | 98 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Michaella Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #63 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #35 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #33 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1996 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #203 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #128 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1998 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #101 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #145 | 1,505 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1999 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #93 | 1,589 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2000 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #95 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #167 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #282 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #61 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2003 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #56 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,549 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #105 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #115 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #131 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,401 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |