H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Emmanuelle Gagliardi vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 1-1

Emmanuelle Gagliardi and Natasha Zvereva are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Emmanuelle Gagliardi leads 1–0 on clay, while Natasha Zvereva leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1999 Birmingham round of 32 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emmanuelle Gagliardi
SUI Age 50 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Natasha Zvereva #17 6-4 6-1 Emmanuelle Gagliardi #79 Match data Jun 10, 1999* R32 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Emmanuelle Gagliardi #102 6-4 6-3 Natasha Zvereva #17 Match data Apr 22, 1999* R32 Cairo Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emmanuelle Gagliardi #736 #42 781 1,695 118 183 39.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,074 394 236 62.5% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emmanuelle Gagliardi Natasha Zvereva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,835 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1988 40–18 69.0% #7 1,997 0 0
18 1995 0–3 0.0% #229 1,465 0 0 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,804 0 0
19 1996 2–1 66.7% #123 1,504 0 0 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,953 0 2
20 1997 7–9 43.8% #78 1,531 0 0 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2
21 1998 5–12 29.4% #101 1,497 0 0 1992 34–20 63.0% #23 1,981 0 2
22 1999 11–14 44.0% #68 1,563 0 0 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,973 0 2
23 2000 13–20 39.4% #95 1,546 0 0 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,979 0 3
24 2001 10–17 37.0% #69 1,546 0 0 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,970 0 3
25 2002 19–23 45.2% #61 1,583 0 0 1996 13–13 50.0% #57 1,897 0 3
26 2003 25–23 52.1% #56 1,608 0 0 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,907 0 3
27 2004 8–18 30.8% #105 1,524 0 0 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,934 0 4
28 2005 10–15 40.0% #95 1,505 0 0 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5
29 2006 7–17 29.2% #115 1,470 0 0 2000 11–13 45.8% #78 1,733 0 5
30 2007 1–10 9.1% #131 1,408 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2008 0–1 0.0% #261 1,401 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,708 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emmanuelle Gagliardi Natasha Zvereva
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 4 1 5 80.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 16 10 26 61.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
18 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 12 6 18 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
19 1996 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1990 15 3 18 83.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1991 13 8 21 61.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9%
21 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 7 7 14 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5%
22 1999 0 2 2 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1993 15 6 21 71.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 6 15 60.0%
23 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0%
24 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 3 9 12 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 2002 14 14 28 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2003 15 14 29 51.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1997 15 10 25 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 2004 4 11 15 26.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1998 15 10 25 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 5 10 50.0%
28 2005 2 6 8 25.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 2006 3 7 10 30.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2007 0 6 6 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 47 83 130 36.2% 59 76 135 43.7% 12 18 30 40.0% 0 6 6 0.0% — 157 98 255 61.6% 98 56 154 63.6% 71 31 102 69.6% 68 51 119 57.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emmanuelle Gagliardi Natasha Zvereva
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1575 112.4 — — — — +63 — — 56.3% -0.12 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — +0.85
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1836 140.5 — — — — -21 -249 -181 63.8% +0.70 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.1 +0.51
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1997 161.2 — — — — -75 -213 -183 66.7% +1.05 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) 106.4 -3.11
18 1995 1465 97.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.25 0–2 1–0 — +0.03 1989 1805 144.1 — — — — +20 -25 -21 57.3% +0.91 4–5 (44%) 2–7 (22%) 91.9 -0.26
19 1996 1504 108.4 — — — — — +73 — 62.5% +0.13 1–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.16 1990 1953 156.8 — — — — -78 -41 -36 65.8% +1.03 10–5 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.3 -0.92
20 1997 1532 110.3 — — — — -57 +95 +68 47.5% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 98.0 +1.15 1991 1912 148.8 — — — — -66 +41 +34 59.2% +0.55 6–3 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 106.2 -0.24
21 1998 1498 101.3 — — — — -92 +128 — 35.7% -1.26 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 +1.10 1992 1982 158.3 — — — — -114 +58 +53 61.3% +0.90 6–5 (55%) 8–6 (57%) 102.4 -2.82
22 1999 1563 123.3 — — — — — +85 +21 43.4% -0.13 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.5 -0.71 1993 1974 157.3 — — — — -22 -9 +90 65.3% +0.98 7–3 (70%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 +0.50
23 2000 1546 120.4 — — — — -122 +106 0 42.1% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 96.9 0.00 1994 1979 161.7 — — — — +7 -6 +1 69.6% +1.40 6–6 (50%) 7–3 (70%) 101.8 -1.08
24 2001 1547 114.9 — — — — -78 +8 +74 42.6% -0.53 5–9 (36%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.16 1995 1971 161.0 — — — — +27 -3 +16 59.5% +0.80 13–7 (65%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 -0.19
25 2002 1584 127.0 — — — — -19 -57 — 46.5% -0.13 7–8 (47%) 6–5 (55%) 101.4 -0.34 1996 1897 147.8 — — — — +45 +39 +91 50.0% -0.02 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.9 -1.77
26 2003 1608 119.0 -1.11 -1.05 0.887 47.4% +3 -1 +6 49.1% -0.17 8–6 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 105.1 +1.34 1997 1907 154.8 — — — — +11 +5 +82 56.3% +0.19 8–4 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 107.1 -3.07
27 2004 1525 104.1 -0.28 -2.38 0.796 45.6% -6 +29 +75 33.9% -1.36 3–6 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 98.5 +0.11 1998 1934 156.7 — — — — -36 -9 +187 60.5% +0.47 7–5 (58%) 4–4 (50%) 99.6 -3.30
28 2005 1506 106.9 +0.17 -1.19 0.996 50.0% -24 +72 — 38.2% -0.60 6–1 (86%) 1–3 (25%) 105.3 +0.98 1999 1825 141.3 — — — — +2 0 +268 54.8% +0.40 8–3 (73%) 3–7 (30%) 99.9 -0.76
29 2006 1470 101.7 -2.03 -1.17 0.901 47.9% -33 +50 +92 34.6% -0.96 2–6 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 95.9 +0.09 2000 1733 128.2 — — — — +39 +59 +392 42.0% -0.66 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -0.52
30 2007 1409 97.3 -2.52 -2.76 0.774 44.8% -23 +90 — 12.5% -2.50 1–1 — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1401 100.1 -0.04 -2.40 0.818 45.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.05 2002 1708 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.15
Career — 1696 117.4 -1.31 -1.73 0.865 47.0% -33 +56 +46 41.2% -0.60 45–59 (43%) 33–33 (50%) 100.5 +1.25 — 2074 160.7 — — — — -23 -15 +55 60.5% +0.69 97–63 (61%) 77–61 (56%) 107.9 -2.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.