H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Emmanuelle Gagliardi vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 1-1
Emmanuelle Gagliardi and Natasha Zvereva are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Emmanuelle Gagliardi leads 1–0 on clay, while Natasha Zvereva leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1999 Birmingham third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 50
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 55
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 1999* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Natasha Zvereva | 6-4 6-1 | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Match data |
| Apr 22, 1999* | Cairo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | 6-4 6-3 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emmanuelle Gagliardi | #736 | #42 | 781 | 1,695 | 117 | 182 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Natasha Zvereva | #201 | #5 | 1,820 | 2,073 | 388 | 232 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Natasha Zvereva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #94 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #27 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,912 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1998 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #101 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #23 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1999 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #19 | 1,972 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2000 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #95 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 1,978 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #14 | 1,971 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #61 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #57 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2003 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #56 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #105 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2005 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #27 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2006 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #115 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #78 | 1,759 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2007 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #131 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,401 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 5 |