H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Emmanuelle Gagliardi vs Tatiana Poutchek H2H: 1-0
Emmanuelle Gagliardi holds a 1–0 lead over Tatiana Poutchek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emmanuelle Gagliardi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Emmanuelle Gagliardi won the 2003 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-7(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 50
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 47
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2003* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | 6-1 6-7(2) 6-3 | Tatiana Poutchek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emmanuelle Gagliardi | #736 | #42 | 781 | 1,695 | 117 | 182 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tatiana Poutchek | #1,078 | #55 | 609 | 1,626 | 51 | 101 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Tatiana Poutchek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #734 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #101 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #86 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #95 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #100 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #121 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #61 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #56 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #105 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #94 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #115 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #131 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,401 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 |