H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Erika De Lone vs Amelie Cocheteux H2H: 1-0
Erika De Lone holds a 1–0 lead over Amelie Cocheteux in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Erika De Lone leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Erika De Lone won the 1999 Kuala Lumpur quarterfinal 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 48
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 1999* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Erika De Lone | 6-1 6-0 | Amelie Cocheteux | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erika De Lone | #425 | #65 | 501 | 1,603 | 42 | 100 | 29.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Amelie Cocheteux | #365 | #55 | 552 | 1,596 | 28 | 53 | 34.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Erika De Lone | Amelie Cocheteux | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #228 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #81 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #200 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #64 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #124 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #180 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #67 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |