H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Erika De Lone vs Angelica Gavaldon H2H: 0-2
Angelica Gavaldon holds a 2–0 lead over Erika De Lone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Angelica Gavaldon leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Angelica Gavaldon won the 1994 San Diego second round 2-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1994* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Angelica Gavaldon | 2-6 7-5 6-4 | Erika De Lone | Match data |
| Nov 5, 1993* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Angelica Gavaldon | 6-1 7-5 | Erika De Lone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erika De Lone | #425 | #65 | 501 | 1,603 | 42 | 100 | 29.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Angelica Gavaldon | #434 | #34 | 237 | 1,733 | 72 | 109 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Erika De Lone | Angelica Gavaldon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #264 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #242 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #64 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #200 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #124 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #219 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #697 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #67 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |