H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Erika De Lone vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 0-1
Asa Carlsson holds a 1–0 lead over Erika De Lone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Asa Carlsson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Asa Carlsson won the 1999 Kuala Lumpur final 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1999* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Asa Carlsson | 6-2 6-4 | Erika De Lone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erika De Lone | #425 | #65 | 501 | 1,603 | 42 | 100 | 29.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Erika De Lone | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #200 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #124 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #67 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 2000 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| 2001 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |