H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Erika De Lone vs Claudia Kohde Kilsch H2H: 1-0
Erika De Lone holds a 1–0 lead over Claudia Kohde Kilsch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Erika De Lone leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Erika De Lone won the 1991 Sydney second round 6-3 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 62
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 1991* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Erika De Lone | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erika De Lone | #425 | #65 | 501 | 1,603 | 42 | 100 | 29.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | #387 | #4 | 77 | 2,157 | 401 | 233 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Erika De Lone | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 36–18 | 66.7% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,914 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #8 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | 1994 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #200 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #5 | 2,115 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #124 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 1996 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #10 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,952 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1999 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #67 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #46 | 1,792 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2000 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #85 | 1,682 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2001 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #78 | 1,647 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |