H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Erika De Lone vs Donna Faber H2H: 0-1

Donna Faber holds a 1–0 lead over Erika De Lone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Donna Faber leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Faber won the 1991 Australian Open round of 128 5-7 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Erika De Lone
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Donna Faber
USA Age 55

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Donna Faber #89 5-7 6-3 6-2 Erika De Lone #130 Match data Jan 16, 1991* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Erika De Lone #425 #65 501 1,603 42 100 29.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Donna Faber #227 #55 19 1,718 68 97 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Erika De Lone Donna Faber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #218 1,495 0 0
16 1989 0–2 0.0% #298 1,472 0 0 1988 6–9 40.0% #131 1,532 0 0
17 1990 4–6 40.0% #138 1,502 0 0 1989 19–19 50.0% #59 1,674 0 0
18 1991 9–14 39.1% #110 1,558 0 0 1990 15–18 45.5% #84 1,630 0 0
19 1992 1–4 20.0% #175 1,526 0 0 1991 15–19 44.1% #99 1,593 0 0
20 1993 5–9 35.7% #183 1,515 0 0 1992 11–20 35.5% #116 1,541 0 0
21 1994 1–9 10.0% #200 1,436 0 0 1993 1–10 9.1% #227 1,431 0 0
22 1995 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1996 2–7 22.2% #131 1,449 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1997 1–3 25.0% #149 1,442 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1998 2–4 33.3% #178 1,443 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1999 5–7 41.7% #67 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2000 7–18 28.0% #118 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2001 0–5 0.0% #180 1,431 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2002 1–3 25.0% #165 1,426 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Erika De Lone Donna Faber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1989 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
17 1990 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1989 15 10 25 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1990 5 7 12 41.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1993 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 8 12 20 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1994 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 3 8 11 27.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 33 62 95 34.7% 3 12 15 20.0% 4 14 18 22.2% 2 12 14 14.3% — 42 53 95 44.2% 19 29 48 39.6% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Erika De Lone Donna Faber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1496 103.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.17 — — — +0.11
16 1989 1472 91.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — 0–1 — +0.43 1988 1532 112.2 — — — — +4 +14 — 40.6% -0.63 1–1 1–1 — +0.30
17 1990 1503 119.2 — — — — +41 — — 42.9% -0.95 0–1 1–1 — +0.36 1989 1675 137.0 — — — — +40 -169 -99 48.9% +0.16 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 +1.23
18 1991 1558 128.6 — — — — +55 — — 40.4% -0.90 5–6 (45%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 -0.39 1990 1631 115.4 — — — — -7 -19 -43 43.1% -0.68 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.90
19 1992 1527 95.8 — — — — +59 — — 30.8% -2.08 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10 1991 1593 109.9 — — — — -20 +38 +10 41.3% -0.77 9–3 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 106.2 +1.62
20 1993 1515 103.3 — — — — +34 — — 33.3% -1.24 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 103.9 +0.69 1992 1542 119.9 — — — — +26 +37 — 38.0% -0.77 4–5 (44%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.56
21 1994 1437 100.1 — — — — +35 — — 21.7% -1.56 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.52 1993 1432 94.2 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -2.12 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.5 +0.77
22 1995 1483 128.5 — — — — -5 +65 — 37.9% -0.69 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 1450 101.8 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% -0.80 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 1443 109.8 — — — — +31 — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 1443 103.8 — — — — +38 — — 35.7% -1.57 1–1 — — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 1510 115.1 — — — — +43 — — 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 1489 107.2 — — — — -3 +9 -68 32.7% -1.58 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 1432 93.8 — — — — +13 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1426 107.8 — — — — +15 — — 40.0% -0.40 0–2 1–0 — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1603 117.1 — — — — +31 +28 -68 35.9% -1.14 14–37 (27%) 10–13 (43%) 87.6 +1.54 — 1719 121.4 — — — — +14 -11 -44 41.2% -0.60 26–20 (57%) 13–17 (43%) 103.5 +3.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.