H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Erika De Lone vs Gabriela Sabatini H2H: 0-1
Gabriela Sabatini holds a 1–0 lead over Erika De Lone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gabriela Sabatini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gabriela Sabatini won the 1991 Boca Raton third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 1991* | Boca Raton | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Gabriela Sabatini | 6-2 6-2 | Erika De Lone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erika De Lone | #425 | #65 | 501 | 1,603 | 42 | 100 | 29.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gabriela Sabatini | #56 | #3 | 228 | 2,398 | 607 | 182 | 76.9% | 1 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 27 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Erika De Lone | Gabriela Sabatini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #74 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #12 | 1,947 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #9 | 2,023 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 62–16 | 79.5% | #6 | 2,264 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 61–13 | 82.4% | #4 | 2,276 | 0 | 9 |
| 19 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,257 | 0 | 13 |
| 20 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 49–14 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,231 | 1 | 15 |
| 21 | 1994 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #200 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 62–11 | 84.9% | #3 | 2,269 | 1 | 20 |
| 22 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #124 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 65–12 | 84.4% | #3 | 2,291 | 1 | 25 |
| 23 | 1996 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #5 | 2,108 | 1 | 25 |
| 24 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 2,055 | 1 | 26 |
| 25 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,062 | 1 | 27 |
| 26 | 1999 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #67 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #56 | 1,947 | 1 | 27 |
| 27 | 2000 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |