H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Erika De Lone vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 1-0
Erika De Lone holds a 1–0 lead over Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Erika De Lone leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Erika De Lone won the 1990 Scottsdale third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 1990* | Scottsdale | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Erika De Lone | 6-3 6-2 | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erika De Lone | #425 | #65 | 501 | 1,603 | 42 | 100 | 29.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Erika De Lone | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1994 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #200 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #124 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1996 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1999 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #67 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2000 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2001 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |