H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Erika De Lone vs Katrina Adams H2H: 2-0
Erika De Lone holds a 2–0 lead over Katrina Adams in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Erika De Lone leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Erika De Lone won the 1995 Birmingham second round 6-2 7-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 1995* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Erika De Lone | 6-2 7-3 | Katrina Adams | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1991* | Westchester | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Erika De Lone | 6-3 6-4 | Katrina Adams | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erika De Lone | #425 | #65 | 501 | 1,603 | 42 | 100 | 29.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Katrina Adams | #625 | #67 | 199 | 1,608 | 55 | 114 | 32.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Erika De Lone | Katrina Adams | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #84 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #200 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #256 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #124 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #143 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #184 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #144 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #67 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #116 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #115 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #278 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #625 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |