H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Erika De Lone vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 0-2

Larisa Savchenko holds a 2–0 lead over Erika De Lone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1998 Birmingham round of 64 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Erika De Lone
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Larisa Savchenko
URS Age 60 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Larisa Savchenko #108 6-2 6-3 Erika De Lone #143 Match data Jun 10, 1998* R64 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Larisa Savchenko #68 0-6 6-3 6-2 Erika De Lone #103 Match data Sep 21, 1995* R32 Moscow Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Erika De Lone #425 #65 501 1,603 42 100 29.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Larisa Savchenko #305 #13 454 1,926 240 241 49.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Erika De Lone Larisa Savchenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1989 0–2 0.0% #298 1,472 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,498 0 0
17 1990 4–6 40.0% #138 1,502 0 0 1984 2–4 33.3% #138 1,506 0 0
18 1991 9–14 39.1% #110 1,558 0 0 1985 15–17 46.9% #55 1,673 0 0
19 1992 1–4 20.0% #175 1,526 0 0 1986 19–16 54.3% #36 1,752 0 0
20 1993 5–9 35.7% #183 1,515 0 0 1987 23–14 62.2% #24 1,793 0 0
21 1994 1–9 10.0% #200 1,436 0 0 1988 28–17 62.2% #16 1,869 0 0
22 1995 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0 1989 24–16 60.0% #20 1,861 0 0
23 1996 2–7 22.2% #131 1,449 0 0 1990 13–18 41.9% #91 1,706 0 0
24 1997 1–3 25.0% #149 1,442 0 0 1991 19–16 54.3% #48 1,699 0 1
25 1998 2–4 33.3% #178 1,443 0 0 1992 18–19 48.6% #58 1,720 0 1
26 1999 5–7 41.7% #67 1,510 0 0 1993 20–17 54.1% #33 1,752 0 2
27 2000 7–18 28.0% #118 1,488 0 0 1994 19–20 48.7% #41 1,809 0 2
28 2001 0–5 0.0% #180 1,431 0 0 1995 11–20 35.5% #99 1,650 0 2
29 2002 1–3 25.0% #165 1,426 0 0 1996 11–14 44.0% #61 1,668 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1997 8–14 36.4% #87 1,620 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1998 8–10 44.4% #73 1,652 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1999 2–8 20.0% #210 1,585 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Erika De Lone Larisa Savchenko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1989 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1984 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
18 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
19 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1993 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
21 1994 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
22 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
23 1996 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 3 9 12 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 11 10 21 52.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 1 6 83.3%
25 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 9 8 17 52.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 1999 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1993 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 2000 3 8 11 27.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1994 6 8 14 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0%
28 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 33 62 95 34.7% 3 12 15 20.0% 4 14 18 22.2% 2 12 14 14.3% — 97 102 199 48.7% 27 47 74 36.5% 70 46 116 60.3% 46 46 92 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Erika De Lone Larisa Savchenko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1989 1472 91.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — 0–1 — +0.43 1983 1498 109.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.18
17 1990 1503 119.2 — — — — +41 — — 42.9% -0.95 0–1 1–1 — +0.36 1984 1507 116.6 — — — — — +100 +55 40.0% -0.87 1–2 (33%) — — +0.25
18 1991 1558 128.6 — — — — +55 — — 40.4% -0.90 5–6 (45%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 -0.39 1985 1674 126.0 — — — — -46 -159 -3 44.2% -0.31 9–6 (60%) 3–5 (38%) 104.0 -0.37
19 1992 1527 95.8 — — — — +59 — — 30.8% -2.08 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10 1986 1752 135.5 — — — — -106 -188 +58 51.2% -0.16 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 103.9 -1.29
20 1993 1515 103.3 — — — — +34 — — 33.3% -1.24 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 103.9 +0.69 1987 1793 136.6 — — — — -74 -246 +115 60.8% +0.61 5–2 (71%) 2–5 (29%) 102.1 +1.13
21 1994 1437 100.1 — — — — +35 — — 21.7% -1.56 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.52 1988 1870 156.5 — — — — -44 — +85 56.9% +0.37 13–8 (62%) 11–6 (65%) 107.7 -2.81
22 1995 1483 128.5 — — — — -5 +65 — 37.9% -0.69 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.88 1989 1862 145.0 — — — — +27 -238 +26 60.2% +0.39 5–10 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 94.3 -0.82
23 1996 1450 101.8 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% -0.80 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — +0.33 1990 1707 132.7 — — — — -4 -54 +235 43.7% -0.39 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) 97.9 -0.20
24 1997 1443 109.8 — — — — +31 — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.34 1991 1699 122.6 — — — — +18 -58 +204 53.7% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 99.3 +1.48
25 1998 1443 103.8 — — — — +38 — — 35.7% -1.57 1–1 — — +0.26 1992 1721 141.5 — — — — +9 -77 +179 49.4% -0.16 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 96.8 -1.79
26 1999 1510 115.1 — — — — +43 — — 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.34 1993 1753 140.6 — — — — +6 -113 +158 52.3% -0.05 7–5 (58%) 3–6 (33%) 98.9 -0.11
27 2000 1489 107.2 — — — — -3 +9 -68 32.7% -1.58 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.13 1994 1809 144.2 — — — — -28 -170 +83 48.4% -0.13 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 102.0 -3.68
28 2001 1432 93.8 — — — — +13 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — +0.32 1995 1650 126.3 — — — — +4 -8 +193 39.1% -0.65 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 99.9 +0.43
29 2002 1426 107.8 — — — — +15 — — 40.0% -0.40 0–2 1–0 — +0.08 1996 1668 126.6 — — — — -51 -53 +258 44.1% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 0–2 — -1.58
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1621 121.0 — — — — +6 -24 +203 38.0% -0.46 5–3 (63%) 0–6 (0%) 97.6 +0.42
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1653 111.5 — — — — -22 -84 +168 48.8% -0.10 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 102.7 +0.09
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1586 92.7 — — — — -28 -65 +209 28.0% -2.28 2–3 (40%) — — +0.24
Career — 1603 117.1 — — — — +31 +28 -68 35.9% -1.14 14–37 (27%) 10–13 (43%) 87.6 +1.54 — 1927 142.7 — — — — -21 -97 +127 49.6% -0.13 96–79 (55%) 46–56 (45%) 98.2 -1.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.