H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Erika De Lone vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 0-2
Larisa Savchenko holds a 2–0 lead over Erika De Lone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1998 Birmingham second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 1998* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Larisa Savchenko | 6-2 6-3 | Erika De Lone | Match data |
| Sep 21, 1995* | Moscow | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Larisa Savchenko | 0-6 6-3 6-2 | Erika De Lone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erika De Lone | #425 | #65 | 501 | 1,603 | 42 | 100 | 29.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Erika De Lone | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #200 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #124 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #67 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 2000 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 2001 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |