H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Erika De Lone vs Laurence Courtois H2H: 0-1

Laurence Courtois holds a 1–0 lead over Erika De Lone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laurence Courtois leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Laurence Courtois won the 1995 Birmingham round of 32 6-2 4-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Erika De Lone
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Laurence Courtois
BEL Age 50 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laurence Courtois #76 6-2 4-6 7-5 Erika De Lone #126 Match data Jun 15, 1995* R32 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Erika De Lone #425 #65 501 1,603 42 100 29.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Laurence Courtois #484 #37 565 1,701 75 94 44.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Erika De Lone Laurence Courtois
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1989 0–2 0.0% #298 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1990 4–6 40.0% #138 1,502 0 0 1993 3–3 50.0% #104 1,520 0 0
18 1991 9–14 39.1% #110 1,558 0 0 1994 8–13 38.1% #105 1,545 0 0
19 1992 1–4 20.0% #175 1,526 0 0 1995 14–14 50.0% #64 1,624 0 0
20 1993 5–9 35.7% #183 1,515 0 0 1996 20–16 55.6% #44 1,697 0 0
21 1994 1–9 10.0% #200 1,436 0 0 1997 4–9 30.8% #183 1,647 0 0
22 1995 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0 1998 4–9 30.8% #125 1,578 0 0
23 1996 2–7 22.2% #131 1,449 0 0 1999 13–17 43.3% #78 1,546 0 0
24 1997 1–3 25.0% #149 1,442 0 0 2000 6–10 37.5% #130 1,538 0 0
25 1998 2–4 33.3% #178 1,443 0 0 2001 3–3 50.0% #166 1,540 0 0
26 1999 5–7 41.7% #67 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2000 7–18 28.0% #118 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2001 0–5 0.0% #180 1,431 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2002 1–3 25.0% #165 1,426 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Erika De Lone Laurence Courtois
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1989 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1993 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
18 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1994 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1993 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1996 9 7 16 56.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1994 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1996 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 5 7 12 41.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1999 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 3 8 11 27.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 33 62 95 34.7% 3 12 15 20.0% 4 14 18 22.2% 2 12 14 14.3% — 22 31 53 41.5% 32 37 69 46.4% 9 11 20 45.0% 12 15 27 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Erika De Lone Laurence Courtois
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1989 1472 91.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — 0–1 — +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 1503 119.2 — — — — +41 — — 42.9% -0.95 0–1 1–1 — +0.36 1993 1521 107.7 — — — — +38 +20 — 53.3% +0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.9 +0.37
18 1991 1558 128.6 — — — — +55 — — 40.4% -0.90 5–6 (45%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 -0.39 1994 1545 117.7 — — — — +33 +35 — 40.0% -1.20 4–4 (50%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.11
19 1992 1527 95.8 — — — — +59 — — 30.8% -2.08 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10 1995 1625 121.6 — — — — -31 -14 -24 50.0% -0.24 3–3 (50%) 8–3 (73%) 105.7 +0.28
20 1993 1515 103.3 — — — — +34 — — 33.3% -1.24 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 103.9 +0.69 1996 1698 120.0 — — — — -38 -71 -19 50.0% -0.11 11–5 (69%) 5–2 (71%) 109.5 +1.19
21 1994 1437 100.1 — — — — +35 — — 21.7% -1.56 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.52 1997 1648 109.2 — — — — +21 -63 — 37.0% -1.26 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.6 +0.08
22 1995 1483 128.5 — — — — -5 +65 — 37.9% -0.69 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.88 1998 1579 117.9 — — — — +32 -27 — 41.9% -0.13 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — +0.02
23 1996 1450 101.8 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% -0.80 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — +0.33 1999 1546 109.3 — — — — +1 +26 +89 45.2% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 3–5 (38%) 97.3 +1.88
24 1997 1443 109.8 — — — — +31 — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.34 2000 1539 113.0 — — — — — +52 — 40.0% -0.27 4–4 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 95.8 -0.15
25 1998 1443 103.8 — — — — +38 — — 35.7% -1.57 1–1 — — +0.26 2001 1540 100.3 — — — — — +39 — 47.1% -0.18 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 +0.63
26 1999 1510 115.1 — — — — +43 — — 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 1489 107.2 — — — — -3 +9 -68 32.7% -1.58 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 1432 93.8 — — — — +13 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1426 107.8 — — — — +15 — — 40.0% -0.40 0–2 1–0 — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1603 117.1 — — — — +31 +28 -68 35.9% -1.14 14–37 (27%) 10–13 (43%) 87.6 +1.54 — 1701 119.8 — — — — -4 +2 +6 45.3% -0.37 33–34 (49%) 26–23 (53%) 102.4 +2.66

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.