H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Erika De Lone vs Mary Lou Piatek H2H: 1-0
Erika De Lone holds a 1–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Erika De Lone leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Erika De Lone won the 1992 Oklahoma third round 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 1992* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Erika De Lone | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erika De Lone | #425 | #65 | 501 | 1,603 | 42 | 100 | 29.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Erika De Lone | Mary Lou Piatek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #200 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #124 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 1996 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 |
| 1999 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #67 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 2000 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 |
| 2001 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |