H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Erika De Lone vs Maureen Drake H2H: 1-1

Erika De Lone and Maureen Drake are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Erika De Lone leads 1–0 on clay, while Maureen Drake leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Erika De Lone won the 2000 Hilton Head round of 64 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Erika De Lone
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Maureen Drake
CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Erika De Lone #70 6-3 6-3 Maureen Drake #78 Match data Apr 19, 2000* R64 Hilton Head Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Maureen Drake #77 6-0 6-1 Erika De Lone #69 Match data Mar 14, 2000* R128 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Erika De Lone #425 #65 501 1,603 42 100 29.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maureen Drake #1,132 #47 612 1,586 40 93 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Erika De Lone Maureen Drake
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1989 0–2 0.0% #298 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1990 4–6 40.0% #138 1,502 0 0 1988 2–4 33.3% #275 1,497 0 0
18 1991 9–14 39.1% #110 1,558 0 0 1989 3–5 37.5% #163 1,505 0 0
19 1992 1–4 20.0% #175 1,526 0 0 1990 1–5 16.7% #209 1,463 0 0
20 1993 5–9 35.7% #183 1,515 0 0 1991 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 0
21 1994 1–9 10.0% #200 1,436 0 0 1992 0–5 0.0% #188 1,412 0 0
22 1995 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0 1993 3–10 23.1% #171 1,416 0 0
23 1996 2–7 22.2% #131 1,449 0 0 1994 1–3 25.0% #170 1,411 0 0
24 1997 1–3 25.0% #149 1,442 0 0 1995 2–2 50.0% #165 1,455 0 0
25 1998 2–4 33.3% #178 1,443 0 0 1996 1–5 16.7% #173 1,432 0 0
26 1999 5–7 41.7% #67 1,510 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #159 1,423 0 0
27 2000 7–18 28.0% #118 1,488 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,412 0 0
28 2001 0–5 0.0% #180 1,431 0 0 1999 12–15 44.4% #57 1,554 0 0
29 2002 1–3 25.0% #165 1,426 0 0 2000 5–12 29.4% #147 1,503 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2001 1–3 25.0% #161 1,493 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2002 4–6 40.0% #99 1,519 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2003 3–8 27.3% #115 1,500 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2004 0–4 0.0% #191 1,460 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #278 1,466 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Erika De Lone Maureen Drake
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1989 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1993 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1994 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1996 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1999 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 3 8 11 27.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 33 62 95 34.7% 3 12 15 20.0% 4 14 18 22.2% 2 12 14 14.3% — 23 57 80 28.8% 8 18 26 30.8% 5 11 16 31.2% 4 7 11 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Erika De Lone Maureen Drake
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1989 1472 91.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — 0–1 — +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 1503 119.2 — — — — +41 — — 42.9% -0.95 0–1 1–1 — +0.36 1988 1498 102.4 — — — — +27 — — 35.7% -1.07 1–1 0–1 — -0.20
18 1991 1558 128.6 — — — — +55 — — 40.4% -0.90 5–6 (45%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 -0.39 1989 1505 108.3 — — — — +37 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 1–1 — +0.46
19 1992 1527 95.8 — — — — +59 — — 30.8% -2.08 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10 1990 1464 106.0 — — — — +29 — — 26.7% -1.87 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61
20 1993 1515 103.3 — — — — +34 — — 33.3% -1.24 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 103.9 +0.69 1991 1451 96.1 — — — — +36 — — 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.35
21 1994 1437 100.1 — — — — +35 — — 21.7% -1.56 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.52 1992 1413 99.9 — — — — +25 — — 16.7% -2.25 0–2 — — +0.07
22 1995 1483 128.5 — — — — -5 +65 — 37.9% -0.69 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.88 1993 1416 110.2 — — — — +28 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.21
23 1996 1450 101.8 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% -0.80 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — +0.33 1994 1412 100.5 — — — — +30 — — 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
24 1997 1443 109.8 — — — — +31 — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.34 1995 1455 122.0 — — — — +21 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–2 — -0.19
25 1998 1443 103.8 — — — — +38 — — 35.7% -1.57 1–1 — — +0.26 1996 1433 102.9 — — — — +40 — — 21.4% -1.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.04
26 1999 1510 115.1 — — — — +43 — — 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.34 1997 1424 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.01
27 2000 1489 107.2 — — — — -3 +9 -68 32.7% -1.58 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.13 1998 1413 103.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.01
28 2001 1432 93.8 — — — — +13 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — +0.32 1999 1555 130.6 — — — — +12 -37 -32 45.0% -0.32 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 102.7 +0.23
29 2002 1426 107.8 — — — — +15 — — 40.0% -0.40 0–2 1–0 — +0.08 2000 1503 118.0 — — — — +70 -25 — 34.2% -0.97 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.30
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1494 98.3 — — — — — — -13 33.3% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1519 116.5 — — — — +20 — -7 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.6 +0.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1501 105.5 -0.96 -1.21 0.910 48.8% -7 -23 — 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 +0.08
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1461 95.4 -2.78 -1.48 0.811 45.3% -19 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 — — +0.03
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1467 97.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.11
Career — 1603 117.1 — — — — +31 +28 -68 35.9% -1.14 14–37 (27%) 10–13 (43%) 87.6 +1.54 — 1586 118.4 -1.69 -1.32 0.868 47.4% +26 -30 -16 35.1% -1.00 14–30 (32%) 10–24 (29%) 89.2 +1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.