H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Erika De Lone vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 0-2

Patricia Hy Boulais holds a 2–0 lead over Erika De Lone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patricia Hy Boulais leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Hy Boulais won the 1996 Cardiff round of 32 6-3 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Erika De Lone
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Patricia Hy Boulais
CAN Age 61 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patricia Hy Boulais 6-3 3-6 6-2 Erika De Lone #129 Match data May 17, 1996* R32 Cardiff Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Patricia Hy Boulais 6-2 6-2 Erika De Lone #187 Match data Sep 18, 1993* QF Hong Kong Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Erika De Lone #425 #65 501 1,603 42 100 29.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,906 142 165 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Erika De Lone Patricia Hy Boulais
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 1989 0–2 0.0% #298 1,472 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1990 4–6 40.0% #138 1,502 0 0 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0
18 1991 9–14 39.1% #110 1,558 0 0 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0
19 1992 1–4 20.0% #175 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1993 5–9 35.7% #183 1,515 0 0 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1
21 1994 1–9 10.0% #200 1,436 0 0 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1
22 1995 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,548 0 1
23 1996 2–7 22.2% #131 1,449 0 0 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,514 0 1
24 1997 1–3 25.0% #149 1,442 0 0 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,573 0 1
25 1998 2–4 33.3% #178 1,443 0 0 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,704 0 1
26 1999 5–7 41.7% #67 1,510 0 0 1992 22–16 57.9% — 1,876 0 1
27 2000 7–18 28.0% #118 1,488 0 0 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,851 0 1
28 2001 0–5 0.0% #180 1,431 0 0 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1
29 2002 1–3 25.0% #165 1,426 0 0 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1996 10–16 38.5% — 1,687 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,663 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,573 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Erika De Lone Patricia Hy Boulais
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1989 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1990 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1983 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 5 0 5 100.0%
21 1994 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1996 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1989 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1999 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1992 8 5 13 61.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 2000 3 8 11 27.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 11 9 20 55.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 5 8 13 38.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 7 8 12.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 33 62 95 34.7% 3 12 15 20.0% 4 14 18 22.2% 2 12 14 14.3% — 72 85 157 45.9% 28 39 67 41.8% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Erika De Lone Patricia Hy Boulais
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1493 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
16 1989 1472 91.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — 0–1 — +0.43 1982 1477 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.18
17 1990 1503 119.2 — — — — +41 — — 42.9% -0.95 0–1 1–1 — +0.36 1983 1546 117.5 — — — — +51 — +83 46.9% +0.12 1–1 1–1 — +0.93
18 1991 1558 128.6 — — — — +55 — — 40.4% -0.90 5–6 (45%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 -0.39 1984 1523 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–1 — +0.06
19 1992 1527 95.8 — — — — +59 — — 30.8% -2.08 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 1515 103.3 — — — — +34 — — 33.3% -1.24 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 103.9 +0.69 1986 1633 110.5 — — — — +41 — — 69.6% +1.65 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) — +2.61
21 1994 1437 100.1 — — — — +35 — — 21.7% -1.56 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.52 1987 1595 115.4 — — — — +48 — +10 37.5% -0.93 5–3 (63%) 1–6 (14%) 97.9 -0.17
22 1995 1483 128.5 — — — — -5 +65 — 37.9% -0.69 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.88 1988 1548 99.0 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–2 — -0.27
23 1996 1450 101.8 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% -0.80 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — +0.33 1989 1515 91.9 — — — — +9 — — 20.0% -2.30 — — — +0.31
24 1997 1443 109.8 — — — — +31 — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.34 1990 1574 118.5 — — — — +7 — — 51.7% +0.41 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.67
25 1998 1443 103.8 — — — — +38 — — 35.7% -1.57 1–1 — — +0.26 1991 1704 141.1 — — — — -20 -265 +2 50.0% +0.11 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.8 -0.45
26 1999 1510 115.1 — — — — +43 — — 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.34 1992 1877 155.6 — — — — -71 -231 -109 56.3% +0.35 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 107.4 -1.82
27 2000 1489 107.2 — — — — -3 +9 -68 32.7% -1.58 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.13 1993 1852 141.8 — — — — -46 -170 +3 57.0% +0.38 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.0 -1.32
28 2001 1432 93.8 — — — — +13 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — +0.32 1994 1756 132.7 — — — — +24 -99 — 52.4% +0.25 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 -0.60
29 2002 1426 107.8 — — — — +15 — — 40.0% -0.40 0–2 1–0 — +0.08 1995 1691 125.6 — — — — +15 -27 — 50.0% -0.18 3–9 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 93.7 +0.06
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1687 132.9 — — — — -41 -41 +161 40.0% -0.73 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -1.41
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1664 129.6 — — — — -71 +1 +194 40.3% -0.58 8–7 (53%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 -0.88
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1574 92.9 — — — — -25 -9 — 26.1% -2.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.04
Career — 1603 117.1 — — — — +31 +28 -68 35.9% -1.14 14–37 (27%) 10–13 (43%) 87.6 +1.54 — 1906 138.1 — — — — -10 -116 +43 47.1% -0.18 50–44 (53%) 22–33 (40%) 98.3 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.