H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Erika De Lone vs Rosalyn Fairbank H2H: 0-1

Rosalyn Fairbank holds a 1–0 lead over Erika De Lone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rosalyn Fairbank leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rosalyn Fairbank won the 1991 Westchester round of 16 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Erika De Lone
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rosalyn Fairbank #58 7-5 6-1 Erika De Lone #115 Match data Jul 26, 1991* R16 Westchester Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Erika De Lone #425 #65 501 1,603 42 100 29.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,932 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Erika De Lone Rosalyn Fairbank
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1989 0–2 0.0% #298 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1990 4–6 40.0% #138 1,502 0 0 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,539 0 0
18 1991 9–14 39.1% #110 1,558 0 0 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,723 0 0
19 1992 1–4 20.0% #175 1,526 0 0 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,677 0 0
20 1993 5–9 35.7% #183 1,515 0 0 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,656 0 0
21 1994 1–9 10.0% #200 1,436 0 0 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,897 0 0
22 1995 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,918 0 1
23 1996 2–7 22.2% #131 1,449 0 0 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,766 0 1
24 1997 1–3 25.0% #149 1,442 0 0 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1
25 1998 2–4 33.3% #178 1,443 0 0 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1
26 1999 5–7 41.7% #67 1,510 0 0 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,755 0 1
27 2000 7–18 28.0% #118 1,488 0 0 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,772 0 1
28 2001 0–5 0.0% #180 1,431 0 0 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,845 0 1
29 2002 1–3 25.0% #165 1,426 0 0 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,787 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,726 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,598 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Erika De Lone Rosalyn Fairbank
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1989 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1978 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
18 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — —
19 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1980 3 6 9 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1993 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1981 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 9 13 30.8%
21 1994 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 8 13 38.5%
22 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 8 4 12 66.7%
23 1996 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 4 7 11 36.4%
24 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 13 11 24 54.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
26 1999 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1987 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
27 2000 3 8 11 27.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1988 11 11 22 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 6 8 14 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 3 8 62.5%
29 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 9 11 20 45.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 33 62 95 34.7% 3 12 15 20.0% 4 14 18 22.2% 2 12 14 14.3% — 109 110 219 49.8% 44 51 95 46.3% 128 76 204 62.7% 51 70 121 42.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Erika De Lone Rosalyn Fairbank
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1989 1472 91.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — 0–1 — +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 1503 119.2 — — — — +41 — — 42.9% -0.95 0–1 1–1 — +0.36 1978 1539 104.5 — — — — — — +66 75.0% +0.75 — 2–0 — +0.38
18 1991 1558 128.6 — — — — +55 — — 40.4% -0.90 5–6 (45%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 -0.39 1979 1724 136.7 — — — — — -159 -3 61.3% +1.02 4–4 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.5 +0.70
19 1992 1527 95.8 — — — — +59 — — 30.8% -2.08 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10 1980 1678 128.5 — — — — -83 -36 +37 52.1% +0.08 6–8 (43%) 1–0 — -0.49
20 1993 1515 103.3 — — — — +34 — — 33.3% -1.24 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 103.9 +0.69 1981 1657 122.8 — — — — -41 +16 +48 40.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.67
21 1994 1437 100.1 — — — — +35 — — 21.7% -1.56 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.52 1982 1897 150.2 — — — — -180 -228 +28 57.5% +0.52 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 105.2 -2.75
22 1995 1483 128.5 — — — — -5 +65 — 37.9% -0.69 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.88 1983 1919 136.6 — — — — -79 -271 +29 53.1% +0.19 7–3 (70%) 1–4 (20%) 101.2 -2.11
23 1996 1450 101.8 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% -0.80 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — +0.33 1984 1767 136.1 — — — — +21 -164 +101 46.8% +0.05 7–8 (47%) 3–8 (27%) 94.2 +0.03
24 1997 1443 109.8 — — — — +31 — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.34 1985 1806 136.7 — — — — -14 -143 +37 51.3% +0.09 9–4 (69%) 9–2 (82%) 109.3 -1.60
25 1998 1443 103.8 — — — — +38 — — 35.7% -1.57 1–1 — — +0.26 1986 1824 142.9 — — — — +15 -154 -17 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 5–4 (56%) 102.0 -2.16
26 1999 1510 115.1 — — — — +43 — — 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.34 1987 1756 134.7 — — — — -60 -105 +159 50.0% +0.03 8–6 (57%) 5–1 (83%) 103.9 -0.46
27 2000 1489 107.2 — — — — -3 +9 -68 32.7% -1.58 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.13 1988 1772 141.1 — — — — -53 -160 +181 56.0% +0.38 7–11 (39%) 8–5 (62%) 98.3 +0.48
28 2001 1432 93.8 — — — — +13 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — +0.32 1989 1845 147.2 — — — — -106 -205 +177 57.8% +0.54 7–5 (58%) 6–8 (43%) 101.7 -0.49
29 2002 1426 107.8 — — — — +15 — — 40.0% -0.40 0–2 1–0 — +0.08 1990 1787 137.3 — — — — -6 — +236 51.9% +0.13 11–3 (79%) 5–2 (71%) 108.9 +0.60
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1637 127.7 — — — — +34 -74 +316 46.1% -0.10 3–7 (30%) 1–5 (17%) 88.8 +1.07
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1726 133.0 — — — — -39 -176 +270 51.5% -0.04 3–3 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 100.5 -1.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1766 146.5 — — — — -14 -176 +196 45.3% -0.44 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 -2.22
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1704 104.2 — — — — -15 — — 0.0% -3.63 — — — -0.30
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1599 97.0 — — — — +23 — +239 15.8% -2.47 0–1 — — +0.12
Career — 1603 117.1 — — — — +31 +28 -68 35.9% -1.14 14–37 (27%) 10–13 (43%) 87.6 +1.54 — 1932 143.7 — — — — -36 -134 +112 51.1% +0.09 105–87 (55%) 65–57 (53%) 105.0 -1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.