H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Erika De Lone vs Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie H2H: 0-3
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie holds a 3–0 lead over Erika De Lone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie won the 2000 Australian Open second round 6-4 5-7 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
Age 53
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 6-4 5-7 6-0 | Erika De Lone | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1996* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | Erika De Lone | Match data |
| Feb 25, 1993* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 6-7 6-2 6-3 | Erika De Lone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erika De Lone | #425 | #65 | 501 | 1,603 | 42 | 100 | 29.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | — | — | — | 1,961 | 186 | 180 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Erika De Lone | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #200 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #124 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 31–15 | 67.4% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1999 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #67 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2000 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2001 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–17 | 34.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 4 |