H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Erika De Lone vs Sandra Kleinova H2H: 0-2
Sandra Kleinova holds a 2–0 lead over Erika De Lone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sandra Kleinova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Kleinova won the 2002 Indian Wells first round 1-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 48
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2002* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Sandra Kleinova | 1-6 6-4 6-3 | Erika De Lone | Match data |
| May 9, 1996* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Sandra Kleinova | 6-7 7-6 6-4 | Erika De Lone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erika De Lone | #425 | #65 | 501 | 1,603 | 42 | 100 | 29.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sandra Kleinova | #759 | #41 | 606 | 1,633 | 59 | 119 | 33.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Erika De Lone | Sandra Kleinova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #128 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #42 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–20 | 13.0% | #163 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #200 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #124 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #127 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #121 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #87 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #67 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #145 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |