H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Erika De Lone vs Yuka Yoshida H2H: 1-0
Erika De Lone holds a 1–0 lead over Yuka Yoshida in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Erika De Lone leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Erika De Lone won the 1998 Tokyo fourth round 6-3 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 50
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 1998* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Erika De Lone | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | Yuka Yoshida | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erika De Lone | #425 | #65 | 501 | 1,603 | 42 | 100 | 29.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yuka Yoshida | #906 | #52 | 476 | 1,625 | 39 | 64 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Erika De Lone | Yuka Yoshida | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #201 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #102 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #200 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #70 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #124 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #103 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #125 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #67 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #227 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #158 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |