H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Esme Emmanuel vs Betty Ann Grubb H2H: 2-3
Betty Ann Grubb holds a 3–2 lead over Esme Emmanuel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Esme Emmanuel leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Betty Ann Grubb won 6-3 9-7 at Agawam in 1970.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 1970 | Agawam | WTA 250 | BR | Hard | Betty Ann Grubb | 6-3 9-7 | Esme Emmanuel | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1969* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Betty Ann Grubb | 6-3 6-2 | Esme Emmanuel | Match data |
| May 20, 1969* | Overland Park | WTA 250 | QF | — | Betty Ann Grubb | 8-6 6-3 | Esme Emmanuel | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1969* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Esme Emmanuel | 6-2 0-6 6-4 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
| Feb 23, 1969* | Boston | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Esme Emmanuel | 7-5 6-3 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Esme Emmanuel | — | — | — | 1,766 | 77 | 85 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Betty Ann Grubb | — | — | — | 1,822 | 124 | 112 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Esme Emmanuel | Betty Ann Grubb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 21–8 | 72.4% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 1969 | 19–14 | 57.6% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 5 |
| 1970 | 30–20 | 60.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 5 |
| 1971 | 4–17 | 19.0% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 5 |
| 1972 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 25–26 | 49.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |