H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Esme Emmanuel vs Linda Tuero H2H: 1-2
Linda Tuero holds a 2–1 lead over Esme Emmanuel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Linda Tuero leads 2–0 on clay, while Esme Emmanuel leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Esme Emmanuel won the 1972 US Open second round 7-6 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1972* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Esme Emmanuel | 7-6 4-6 6-3 | Linda Tuero | Match data |
| May 3, 1968* | Atlanta | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Linda Tuero | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Esme Emmanuel | Match data |
| Apr 20, 1968* | Houston | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Linda Tuero | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | Esme Emmanuel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Esme Emmanuel | — | — | — | 1,766 | 77 | 85 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Linda Tuero | — | — | — | 1,972 | 175 | 78 | 69.2% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Esme Emmanuel | Linda Tuero | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 29–10 | 74.4% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 22–6 | 78.6% | — | 1,880 | 0 | 9 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | 1968 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 45–15 | 75.0% | — | 1,880 | 0 | 13 |
| 22 | 1969 | 19–14 | 57.6% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 23–17 | 57.5% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 13 |
| 23 | 1970 | 30–20 | 60.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 4–17 | 19.0% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 13 |