H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Esme Emmanuel vs Marilyn Aschner H2H: 1-0

Esme Emmanuel holds a 1–0 lead over Marilyn Aschner in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Esme Emmanuel won the 1969 Tel Aviv Maccabiah Games quarterfinal 3-6 7-5 6-1.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Esme Emmanuel 3-6 7-5 6-1 Marilyn Aschner Match data Aug 2, 1969* QF Tel Aviv Maccabiah Games WTA 250

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Esme Emmanuel 1,773 77 85 47.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Marilyn Aschner 1,615 41 52 44.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Esme Emmanuel Marilyn Aschner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1968 20–20 50.0% 1,517 0 0
21 1968 11–14 44.0% 1,509 0 1 1969 8–21 27.6% 1,462 0 0
22 1969 19–14 57.6% 1,657 0 1 1970 13–10 56.5% 1,575 0 1
23 1970 30–20 60.0% 1,745 0 2
24 1971 4–17 19.0% 1,669 0 2 1972 0–1 0.0% 1,574 0 1
25 1972 13–20 39.4% 1,691 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Esme Emmanuel Marilyn Aschner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1968 17 11 28 60.7% 3 9 12 25.0%
21 1968 0 2 2 0.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1969 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1969 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1970 11 10 21 52.4% 2 0 2 100.0%
23 1970 8 6 14 57.1% 10 6 16 62.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 1972 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1972 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 3 3 0.0%
Career 13 15 28 46.4% 24 29 53 45.3% 29 25 54 53.7% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 32 29 61 52.5% 6 16 22 27.3% 3 2 5 60.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Esme Emmanuel Marilyn Aschner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1968 1518 114.9 +80 -81 52.9% +0.24 3–6 (33%) -0.40
21 1968 1510 105.5 -13 +12 +2 47.3% -0.33 1–6 (14%) +0.43 1969 1463 100.7 -2 +60 -5 29.7% -1.73 3–5 (38%) -0.18
22 1969 1658 119.2 +43 -96 -61 53.9% +0.20 7–3 (70%) -0.76 1970 1575 131.5 +29 61.2% +1.20 1–4 (20%) +1.13
23 1970 1745 133.9 -17 -69 -74 58.9% +0.80 6–7 (46%) 0–1 +0.03
24 1971 1670 123.4 -35 -59 -11 21.4% -2.00 1–3 (25%) 0–2 -2.46 1972 1575 99.8 0.0% -5.50 -0.33
25 1972 1691 124.2 -123 -130 +35 39.4% -1.01 7–2 (78%) 1–0 -3.87
Career 1773 126.6 -15 -59 -24 47.6% -0.21 22–21 (51%) 1–3 (25%) 100.5 -4.20 1615 116.3 -2 +59 -48 47.0% -0.21 7–15 (32%) +0.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.