H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Esme Emmanuel vs Patricia Cody H2H: 1-0

Esme Emmanuel holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Cody in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Esme Emmanuel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Esme Emmanuel won the 1969 Phoenix round of 16 6-3 7-5.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Esme Emmanuel 6-3 7-5 Patricia Cody Match data Mar 21, 1969* R16 Phoenix WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Esme Emmanuel 1,773 77 85 47.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Patricia Cody 1,562 24 47 33.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Esme Emmanuel Patricia Cody
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1968 11–14 44.0% 1,509 0 1
22 1969 19–14 57.6% 1,657 0 1
23 1970 30–20 60.0% 1,745 0 2
24 1971 4–17 19.0% 1,669 0 2
25 1972 13–20 39.4% 1,691 0 2
28 1968 5–9 35.7% 1,487 0 0
29 1969 9–10 47.4% 1,536 0 0
30 1970 5–13 27.8% 1,469 0 0
31 1971 3–9 25.0% 1,454 0 0
32 1972 1–1 50.0% 1,461 0 0
33 1973 1–4 20.0% 1,448 0 0
34 1974 0–1 0.0% 1,431 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Esme Emmanuel Patricia Cody
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 1968 1510 105.5 -13 +12 +2 47.3% -0.33 1–6 (14%) +0.43
22 1969 1658 119.2 +43 -96 -61 53.9% +0.20 7–3 (70%) -0.76
23 1970 1745 133.9 -17 -69 -74 58.9% +0.80 6–7 (46%) 0–1 +0.03
24 1971 1670 123.4 -35 -59 -11 21.4% -2.00 1–3 (25%) 0–2 -2.46
25 1972 1691 124.2 -123 -130 +35 39.4% -1.01 7–2 (78%) 1–0 -3.87
28 1968 1487 103.4 +18 +3 36.7% -0.97 1–3 (25%) +0.04
29 1969 1537 113.1 +31 +16 50.0% -0.02 1–3 (25%) +0.80
30 1970 1469 96.6 +29 -17 25.7% -1.69 2–1 (67%) +0.28
31 1971 1454 98.1 +90 0 32.0% -1.52 1–2 (33%) +0.19
32 1972 1461 104.6 60.0% +1.40 0–1 +0.14
33 1973 1449 92.8 +92 25.0% -2.63 1–0 +0.35
34 1974 1431 96.4 0.0% -2.50 +0.37
Career 1773 126.6 -15 -59 -24 47.6% -0.21 22–21 (51%) 1–3 (25%) 100.5 -4.20 1563 102.8 +48 +23 -4 36.7% -0.99 5–10 (33%) 1–0 +3.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.