H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Esme Laing vs D Higham H2H: 1-0

Esme Laing holds a 1–0 lead over D Higham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Esme Laing leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Esme Laing won the 1968 Hoylake round of 32 6-2 6-3.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Esme Laing 6-2 6-3 D Higham Match data Jul 18, 1968* R32 Hoylake WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Esme Laing 1,519 2 4 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
D Higham 1,500 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Esme Laing D Higham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1968 1–1 50.0% 1,506 0 0 1968 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0
1970 1–1 50.0% 1,518 0 0
1971 0–1 0.0% 1,501 0 0
1972 0–1 0.0% 1,497 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Esme Laing D Higham
Yr Grass Yr Grass
W L M Win % W L M Win %
1968 1 1 2 50.0% 1968 0 1 1 0.0%
1970 1 1 2 50.0%
1971 0 1 1 0.0%
1972 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 2 4 6 33.3% Career 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Esme Laing D Higham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1968 1507 100.9 50.0% -0.50 -0.03 1968 1484 96.5 0.0% -3.50 +0.08
1970 1518 104.3 50.0% -0.75 +0.02
1971 1501 96.2 0.0% -3.50 +0.19
1972 1497 103.9 0.0% -4.00 -0.22
Career 1519 102.5 33.3% -1.67 -0.67 Career 1500 98.2 0.0% -3.50 +8.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.