H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Etsuko Inoue vs Beverly Bowes H2H: 2-0
Etsuko Inoue holds a 2–0 lead over Beverly Bowes in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Etsuko Inoue leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Etsuko Inoue won the 1990 Australian Open first round 6-3 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 61
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 1990* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Etsuko Inoue | 6-3 7-6(5) | Beverly Bowes | Match data |
| Sep 18, 1987* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Etsuko Inoue | 6-3 6-4 | Beverly Bowes | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etsuko Inoue | #310 | #26 | 27 | 1,803 | 120 | 132 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Beverly Bowes | #597 | #49 | 16 | 1,678 | 69 | 120 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Etsuko Inoue | Beverly Bowes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #70 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #80 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #75 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #62 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #101 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #113 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #130 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #426 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |