Etsuko Inoue
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Minter | 3 | 5 | 8 | Feb 1, 1990 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 6 | 6 | Mar 21, 1989 | H2H |
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 3, 1989 | H2H |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Betsy Nagelsen | 4 | 1 | 5 | Mar 4, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan holds a 4–0 lead over Etsuko Inoue in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 2–0 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1988 Eastbourne Open round of 64 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-4 6-4 | Etsuko Inoue | Match data | Jun 15, 1988* | R64 | Eastbourne Open | WTA 250 | Grass |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-2 6-3 | Etsuko Inoue | Match data | Aug 27, 1987* | R32 | Mahwah | WTA 250 | Hard |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-4 7-5 | Etsuko Inoue | Match data | Dec 1, 1985* | R32 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-3 6-1 | Etsuko Inoue | Match data | Jan 31, 1985* | R32 | Marco Island | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etsuko Inoue | #310 | #26 | 27 | 1,803 | 120 | 133 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 261 | 192 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Etsuko Inoue | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #70 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #80 | 1,635 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1987 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1988 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #52 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 29–23 | 55.8% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Etsuko Inoue | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1981 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 1984 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1982 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1983 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1984 | 18 | 4 | 22 | 81.8% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1987 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1985 | 17 | 5 | 22 | 77.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% |
| 23 | 1988 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1986 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 1989 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1987 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 25 | 1990 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1988 | 18 | 13 | 31 | 58.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| Career | — | 57 | 67 | 124 | 46.0% | 14 | 18 | 32 | 43.8% | 35 | 34 | 69 | 50.7% | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | — | 121 | 80 | 201 | 60.2% | 38 | 41 | 79 | 48.1% | 42 | 28 | 70 | 60.0% | 55 | 39 | 94 | 58.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Etsuko Inoue | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1980 | 1488 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 1483 | 100.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.02 | 1979 | 1487 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.03 |
| 17 | 1982 | 1523 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | +58 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.09 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 1642 | 120.1 | — | — | — | — | +5 | -38 | -81 | 52.9% | +0.06 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–0 | — | +1.48 | 1981 | 1488 | 105.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.5% | -1.19 | 0–2 | 2–0 | — | +0.21 |
| 19 | 1984 | 1700 | 134.3 | — | — | — | — | -9 | -31 | -114 | 50.6% | +0.12 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–5 (38%) | 98.1 | +0.10 | 1982 | 1475 | 107.8 | — | — | — | — | +48 | +48 | — | 38.2% | -1.03 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–1 | — | +0.48 |
| 20 | 1985 | 1633 | 117.6 | — | — | — | — | -18 | +12 | -71 | 41.3% | -0.66 | 5–7 (42%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.4 | +0.47 | 1983 | 1524 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | +40 | — | — | 44.4% | +0.06 | 2–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.40 |
| 21 | 1986 | 1636 | 124.5 | — | — | — | — | -97 | — | +70 | 42.6% | -0.57 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–3 (50%) | 100.2 | -0.52 | 1984 | 1790 | 134.0 | — | — | — | — | +46 | -198 | -179 | 61.8% | +0.63 | 7–7 (50%) | 6–2 (75%) | 104.4 | +0.87 |
| 22 | 1987 | 1765 | 138.1 | — | — | — | — | -109 | — | +24 | 59.0% | +0.54 | 4–9 (31%) | 3–1 (75%) | 97.8 | +0.20 | 1985 | 1975 | 162.0 | — | — | — | — | +82 | -345 | -300 | 67.9% | +1.41 | 9–7 (56%) | 2–2 (50%) | 105.1 | -1.46 |
| 23 | 1988 | 1703 | 132.8 | — | — | — | — | -74 | — | +78 | 48.4% | -0.06 | 4–8 (33%) | 5–2 (71%) | 97.7 | -0.96 | 1986 | 1882 | 146.6 | — | — | — | — | +39 | -212 | -145 | 53.9% | +0.50 | 11–8 (58%) | 3–7 (30%) | 100.6 | -0.51 |
| 24 | 1989 | 1670 | 137.7 | — | — | — | — | -24 | — | +87 | 47.4% | -0.14 | 4–8 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.6 | -0.43 | 1987 | 1873 | 150.2 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -182 | +26 | 60.2% | +0.81 | 7–3 (70%) | 8–2 (80%) | 108.4 | +0.96 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1661 | 128.5 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | +100 | 49.2% | -0.24 | 4–3 (57%) | 5–1 (83%) | 104.2 | -0.07 | 1988 | 1796 | 140.3 | — | — | — | — | +23 | -122 | +73 | 53.3% | +0.22 | 10–10 (50%) | 7–6 (54%) | 97.1 | -0.66 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1784 | 144.8 | — | — | — | — | -16 | -119 | +141 | 58.3% | +0.58 | 10–9 (53%) | 9–4 (69%) | 101.1 | -0.14 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1726 | 134.9 | — | — | — | — | +39 | -38 | +188 | 55.6% | +0.40 | 4–7 (36%) | 3–1 (75%) | 95.7 | +2.94 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1715 | 132.5 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -28 | +190 | 53.5% | +0.22 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–3 (57%) | 97.5 | +3.85 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1637 | 122.8 | — | — | — | — | +57 | — | +258 | 44.4% | -0.27 | 3–0 (100%) | 4–1 (80%) | 105.9 | +2.19 |
| Career | — | 1803 | 134.7 | — | — | — | — | -33 | -20 | +14 | 49.1% | -0.11 | 32–49 (40%) | 25–17 (60%) | 99.0 | +0.19 | — | 1990 | 146.8 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -131 | -2 | 56.2% | +0.47 | 69–62 (53%) | 48–30 (62%) | 107.5 | +2.01 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Minter | 3 | 5 | 8 | Feb 1, 1990 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 6 | 6 | Mar 21, 1989 | H2H |
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 3, 1989 | H2H |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Betsy Nagelsen | 4 | 1 | 5 | Mar 4, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 14 | 14 | Jul 3, 1991 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 3 | 7 | 10 | Sep 2, 1992 | H2H |
| Catherine Tanvier | 7 | 2 | 9 | Feb 14, 1992 | H2H |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 2 | 6 | 8 | Oct 28, 1989 | H2H |
| Camille Benjamin | 5 | 2 | 7 | Aug 14, 1991 | H2H |