H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Etsuko Inoue vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 0-4
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan holds a 4–0 lead over Etsuko Inoue in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 2–0 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1988 Eastbourne second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 61
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 1988* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-4 6-4 | Etsuko Inoue | Match data |
| Aug 27, 1987* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-2 6-3 | Etsuko Inoue | Match data |
| Dec 1, 1985* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-4 7-5 | Etsuko Inoue | Match data |
| Jan 31, 1985* | Marco Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-3 6-1 | Etsuko Inoue | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etsuko Inoue | #310 | #26 | 27 | 1,803 | 120 | 132 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Etsuko Inoue | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #70 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #80 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |